2010
DOI: 10.1021/jp103747t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoinduced Charge Carrier Dynamics of Zn−Porphyrin−TiO2 Electrodes: The Key Role of Charge Recombination for Solar Cell Performance

Abstract: Time resolved absorption spectroscopy has been used to study photoinduced electron injection and charge recombination in Zn-porphyrin sensitized nanostructured TiO(2) electrodes. The electron transfer dynamics is correlated to the performance of dye sensitized solar cells based on the same electrodes. We find that the dye/semiconductor binding can be described with a heterogeneous geometry where the Zn-porphyrin molecules are attached to the TiO(2) surface with a distribution of tilt angles. The binding angle … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

25
264
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(290 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
25
264
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, despite their theoretical superiority, DSCs equipped with porphyrin sensitizers and Co(polypyridyl) redox couples largely fail to outperform those with ruthenium-based sensitizers and the I − /I 3 − system. Their inferior performance is primarily attributable to the severe molecular aggregation in porphyrin sensitizers induced by π-π stacking of the heterocyclic body on TiO 2 NP surfaces, charge recombination between the electron in the conduction band of the TiO 2 and porphyrin radical cation [ 10 ] as well as the sluggish mass transport of cobalt mediators in conventional mesoporous TiO 2 fi lms, [ 11 ] which lead to lower short-circuit currents ( J SC ) and consequently to low PCE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, despite their theoretical superiority, DSCs equipped with porphyrin sensitizers and Co(polypyridyl) redox couples largely fail to outperform those with ruthenium-based sensitizers and the I − /I 3 − system. Their inferior performance is primarily attributable to the severe molecular aggregation in porphyrin sensitizers induced by π-π stacking of the heterocyclic body on TiO 2 NP surfaces, charge recombination between the electron in the conduction band of the TiO 2 and porphyrin radical cation [ 10 ] as well as the sluggish mass transport of cobalt mediators in conventional mesoporous TiO 2 fi lms, [ 11 ] which lead to lower short-circuit currents ( J SC ) and consequently to low PCE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,[18][19][20] Strategies to remove such limitations have driven the development of several new porphyrin dyes, [21][22][23][24] however, despite encouraging progress, the reasons for limitations in porphyrin sensitizer performance are not completely understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparable values for τ 1 for all derivatives suggests that this EI process does not occur via the anchoring ligand, but instead directly from the zinc phthalocyanine core toward the TiO 2 , possibly via a through-space mechanism. 43 The second component can be attributed to a through-bond EI. Increasing the length of the spacer in between the anchoring ligand and the molecule (TT1 → TT6) slows down EI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%