2013
DOI: 10.4324/9780203153215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photography: History and Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of those operating within an emergent paradigm shift in photographic theory and criticism include Azoulay (2008), 2012), Campbell (2015), Chouliaraki (2013), Emerling (2012), Kennedy (2016), Kozol (2014), Linfield (2010), Ritchin (2010), Schwartz (1998), Sliwinski (2011), Levi Strauss (2014.…”
Section: Disclosure Statementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Examples of those operating within an emergent paradigm shift in photographic theory and criticism include Azoulay (2008), 2012), Campbell (2015), Chouliaraki (2013), Emerling (2012), Kennedy (2016), Kozol (2014), Linfield (2010), Ritchin (2010), Schwartz (1998), Sliwinski (2011), Levi Strauss (2014.…”
Section: Disclosure Statementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…27 El uso de las fotografías en estos reportajes incorpora, como en este caso, un discurso paralelo o de refuerzo, que en otros momentos se formula directamente como fotomontaje. Emerling (2012 voluntaria y masivamente la religión, convencidos de que esta conspira contra el socialismo y, consecuentemente, contra sus derechos; según él, son los trabajadores -no el Estado-quienes piden, por ejemplo, que las iglesias se destinen a usos culturales. El mensaje resultaría seguramente caro para quien desde joven había protestado contra la hipocresía social de la Iglesia católica en España y los efectos desmovilizadores de la religión 29 .…”
Section: Viaje Al País De Los Sóviets: Contando Lo Vividounclassified
“…In an essay for a 2007 art exhibition, Beautiful Suffering: Photography and the Traffic in Pain , Mark Reinhardt pointed out that one consistent critique, starting from the Frankfurt School and going up to the late Allan Sekula, has been that aestheticizing suffering is “politically reactionary” and invites “sadism” on the part of the viewer. Reinhardt pushed back against this position, arguing that Sekula’s charge of “retinal excitation” (Emerling, 2012, p. 106) makes an error by forcefully separating the purely visual impact from the critical possibilities. For Reinhardt, images have far more possibility than this binary, as he asked, “Is there not something in images that resists or eludes every effort to fix meaning through language?” (Reinhardt, 2007, p. 24).…”
Section: On Brutalitymentioning
confidence: 99%