Photographic Standards for Patients With Facial Palsy and Recommendations by Members of the Sir Charles Bell Society

Abstract

IMPORTANCEThere is no widely accepted assessment tool or common language used by clinicians caring for patients with facial palsy, making exchange of information challenging. Standardized photography may represent such a language and is imperative for precise exchange of information and comparison of outcomes in this special patient population.OBJECTIVES To review the literature to evaluate the use of facial photography in the management of patients with facial palsy and to examine the use of photography in documenting facial nerve function among members of the Sir Charles Bell Society-a group of medical professionals dedicated to care of patients with facial palsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA literature search was performed to review photographic standards in patients with facial palsy. In addition, a cross-sectional survey of members of the Sir Charles Bell Society was conducted to examine use of medical photography in documenting facial nerve function. The literature search and analysis was performed in August and September 2015, and the survey was conducted in August and September 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe literature review searched EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE databases from inception of each database through September 2015. Additional studies were identified by scanning references from relevant studies. Only English-language articles were eligible for inclusion. Articles that discussed patients with facial palsy and outlined photographic guidelines for this patient population were included in the study. The survey was disseminated to the Sir Charles Bell Society members in electronic form. It consisted of 10 questions related to facial grading scales, patient-reported outcome measures, other psychological assessment tools, and photographic and videographic recordings. RESULTSIn total, 393 articles were identified in the literature search, 7 of which fit the inclusion criteria. Six of the 7 articles discussed or proposed views specific to patients with facial palsy. However, none of the articles specifically focused on photographic standards for the population with facial palsy. Eighty-three of 151 members (55%) of the Sir Charles Bell Society responded to the survey. All survey respondents used photographic documentation, but there was variability in which facial expressions were used. Eighty-two percent (68 of 83) used some form of videography. From these data, we propose a set of minimum photographic standards for patients with facial palsy, including the following 10 static views: at rest or repose, small closed-mouth smile, large smile showing teeth, elevation of eyebrows, closure of eyes gently, closure of eyes tightly, puckering of lips, showing bottom teeth, snarling or wrinkling of the nose, and nasal base view. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThere is no consensus on photographic standardization to report outcomes for patients with facial palsy. Minimum photographic standards for facial paralysis publications are proposed. Videography of the dynamic movements of these views should also be ...

Evaluation of Societal Health Utility of Facial Palsy and Facial Reanimation

“…Several studies have investigated the health utility of facial palsy among naïve observers using static facial photographs. 20,21,37 Grading facial function using standard video of facial expressions has demonstrated high agreement with in-person assessment, 38,39 but to our knowledge only one previous study has used video to assess the health utility of facial palsy, 37 and the health utility of the postfacial reanimation state has not been characterized. In our study, we used standard videos of facial expressions to assess societal preference for 3 manifestations of facial palsy.…”

Toward an Automatic System for Computer-Aided Assessment in Facial Palsy

“…A clinical photographer captured high-resolution photographs (1080 x 720 pixels) of a standardized series of facial expressions used to evaluate facial mimetic function. 35 Figure 1 exemplifies the type of photographs taken from each patient; all images were taken from the frontal view using a digital camera with optimal lighting. In addition to the patient's photographs, we obtained high-resolution photographs of healthy controls from the MEEI Facial Palsy Photo and Video Standard Set 14 performing the same standardized facial expressions as the patients.…”

Establishing Photographic Standards for Facial Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature

“…Functional views are also recommended, such as smiling, frowning, voluntary blinking, lip puckering, eye movement, jaw occlusion, elevation of the eyebrows, and puffing out the cheeks. 25 , 26 …”

“… 17 Use of the Frankfort horizontal can help standardize the position of the head and mitigate deviations that can lead to distortion of outcomes. 23 , 25 …”