1988
DOI: 10.1515/jnet.1988.13.1.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photographic Evidence for the Mechanism of Fragmentation of a Single Drop of Melt in Triggered Steam Explosion Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters of the experimental series A, B, and C were adjusted so that each fragmentation process acted on the melt in comparable proportion and intensity in all three series (seven runs each). Additional fragmentation was expected to occur with increasing kinetic energy release from B and A relative to C. Furthermore, a specific fragmentation mechanism was predicted and described during the fine-fragmentation phase of MFCI [Nelson et al, 1988;FrShlich, 1991;Zimanowski et al, 1991Zimanowski et al, , 1995a. These studies, however, were based on indirect observations only, and a direct proof of the existence and abundance of these particles (i.e., interactive particles) has not yet been achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of the experimental series A, B, and C were adjusted so that each fragmentation process acted on the melt in comparable proportion and intensity in all three series (seven runs each). Additional fragmentation was expected to occur with increasing kinetic energy release from B and A relative to C. Furthermore, a specific fragmentation mechanism was predicted and described during the fine-fragmentation phase of MFCI [Nelson et al, 1988;FrShlich, 1991;Zimanowski et al, 1991Zimanowski et al, , 1995a. These studies, however, were based on indirect observations only, and a direct proof of the existence and abundance of these particles (i.e., interactive particles) has not yet been achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%