1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.34.2201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photofission and photoneutron cross sections and photofission neutron multiplicities forU233,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
52
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
52
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The 11 MeV 239 Pu(γ,f) and 197 Au(γ,n) 196 Au cross-section values were taken from Refs. [13] and [10], respectively. The results are given in column two of Table II.…”
Section: Experimental Procedure Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 11 MeV 239 Pu(γ,f) and 197 Au(γ,n) 196 Au cross-section values were taken from Refs. [13] and [10], respectively. The results are given in column two of Table II.…”
Section: Experimental Procedure Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show in Fig. 2 Bremsstrahlung photon beams [12] and photons produced by positron annihilation in flight [16]. Good overall agreement is verified in the whole energy interval.…”
Section: A Case Study: 237 Np(γ F )mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…(i) In the first place, there are several works presenting calculations of fission barrier heights, using semimicroscopic models based on the Strutinsky [26][27][28] and Hartree-Fock [29,30] methods. However, absolute values for barrier heights from these theoretical approaches, are systematically lower than those obtained from the fitting of cross sections by means of statistical model calculations [11][12][13][14][15][16]23,24]. (ii) In the second place, and considering that the uncertainties associated with our measurements [15] are modest, we note that small differences between the selected barrier heights entering our model calculations could eventually destroy the agreement between level groups (and level voids) and the corresponding structures in the measured cross sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gurevich [21] and de Moraes [22] directly measured the photoabsorption cross section, whereas Berman [23] measured the main partial cross sections. Their sum also gives the total photoabsorption cross section.…”
Section: Plutonium-239mentioning
confidence: 99%