1991
DOI: 10.1016/0379-6779(91)91613-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoexcitation spectroscopy of pernigraniline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also for the PB we obtain the same general behaviour as the bands proposed in the literature [31] and the reproduction of the main experimental optical transitions [34][35][36] at 2.2, 3.8 and 4.3 eV (see Fig. 4b).…”
Section: Band Structures Of the Leucoemeraldine Emeraldine And Pernisupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also for the PB we obtain the same general behaviour as the bands proposed in the literature [31] and the reproduction of the main experimental optical transitions [34][35][36] at 2.2, 3.8 and 4.3 eV (see Fig. 4b).…”
Section: Band Structures Of the Leucoemeraldine Emeraldine And Pernisupporting
confidence: 59%
“…4c). This value approaches the experimental measurements of the gap (maximum absorption at about 2 eV [32][33][34][35][36][37]), better than the values proposed in the literature (0.6-0.9 eV [10,31]). As noticed in Ref.…”
Section: Band Structures Of the Leucoemeraldine Emeraldine And Pernimentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Steady state photoinduced absorption experiments show the presence of a photoinduced charge defect of effective --5 me and a photoinduced charge defect of effective mass -300me. Because of the enormous difference in their effective mass and their lifetimes, the low energy peak is associated with a solitonic defect in the bond length order parameter while the middle energy peak is associated with a polaronic defect in the ring torsion angle order parameter [36]. Light induced electron spin resonance studies support these assignments (37].…”
Section: E Leucoemeraldinesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Previous experimental studies found that the maximum in the π−π* optical absorption spectrum in the LB form is 3.6 eV in N -methylpyrrolidone (NMP) solution and 3.8 eV in thin film. The excitation energy (band gap) is large because the benzene rings are connected by a saturated amine linkage which inhibits conjugation. In contrast, the π−π* absorption in the PNB forms is much lower (1.7∼2.3 eV) because the benzene rings are conjugate through an imine linkage. In the doped (ES) form, electrical conductivity is greatly increased by the formation of low-energy hole levels. , The experimental absorption spectrum for ES shows a band gap of 1.5 eV which is interpreted as excitations to the polaron band. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%