1965
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.14.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoemissive Determination of Barrier Shape in Tunnel Junctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These measurements also eliminate some earlier suggested models for the magnetoelectric effect, but remain consistent with the symmetry requirements for the observation of a magnetoelectric effect in this material. Our results firmly establish the model used by Bertaut et al 3 to interpret their unpublished zero-field neutron diffraction measurements with powders.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These measurements also eliminate some earlier suggested models for the magnetoelectric effect, but remain consistent with the symmetry requirements for the observation of a magnetoelectric effect in this material. Our results firmly establish the model used by Bertaut et al 3 to interpret their unpublished zero-field neutron diffraction measurements with powders.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Experimental samples were prepared as previously described, 3 with the exception that the electrodes were both semitransparent and of equal thickness. The Al 2 O s thickness was approximately 40 A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a)] due to the conservation of the electric displacement (Gauss' law). This effect was theoretically proposed more than forty years ago 11 based on the early studies of metal/dielectric interfaces [12][13][14][15][16] , and it was suggested that it should be dominant over image force or tunneling contributions in the limit of large S ε . Practically, however, this effect is negligible in conventional semiconductors, and the assumption of perfect screening in the abrupt junction approximation provides a quantitatively accurate band diagram.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is conjectured to be due to inelastic scattering in the built-in field in the oxide conduction band. 8 The current due to electrons excited in the bottom electrode and traversing the oxide layer opposite to the built-in field will be attenuated. In contrast, electrons excited in the top electrode will reach the opposite electrode in spite of such processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%