1970
DOI: 10.1063/1.1653240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoemission Studies of Interface Barrier Energies of Irradiated Mos Structures

Abstract: The effects of ionizing radiation in large geometry MOS structures were studied by use of internal photoemission techniques. Barrier heights at both the silicon-silicon dioxide and the silicon dioxide-metal (chromium) interface were measured before and after irradiation in a Co60 gamma cell. It was determined that the measured barrier energy heights were considerably reduced by radiation-induced oxide charge.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First there is a trap level 1.5 eV below the con- duction band in Si02 that can be annealed out; electrons are injected into this level with the unannealed samples and have sufficient mobility to travel along this trap level through the sample. It should be noted that trap levels (18) 2.0 eV below the conduction band have been reported and that irradiation has changed barrier heights at Si-SiO2 and Cr-SiO2 interfaces (23). In the second model, unannealed charge trapped in the bulk varies the potential distribution within the oxide resulting in a nonlinear potential vs. distance profile thereby altering the shape of the tunneling barrier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First there is a trap level 1.5 eV below the con- duction band in Si02 that can be annealed out; electrons are injected into this level with the unannealed samples and have sufficient mobility to travel along this trap level through the sample. It should be noted that trap levels (18) 2.0 eV below the conduction band have been reported and that irradiation has changed barrier heights at Si-SiO2 and Cr-SiO2 interfaces (23). In the second model, unannealed charge trapped in the bulk varies the potential distribution within the oxide resulting in a nonlinear potential vs. distance profile thereby altering the shape of the tunneling barrier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%