“…On the other hand, the performances of DSPECs are usually modest, most certainly because the dye must feed the catalyst with several redox equivalents before catalysis occurs. − This requirement is particularly demanding in the context of a photosensitized electrode because it implies that (i) the dye photoexcitation frequency is high, so that the same dye absorbs photons at close intervals in order to funnel several charges to the catalyst before charge recombination takes place, which is a difficult task with the low photon flux of sunlight or (ii) the lateral charge diffusion inside the monolayer of the chemisorbed molecules is quite efficient, at least faster than charge recombination, so that several different oxidized dyes could feed the catalyst with oxidation equivalents. − As a result, choosing an oxidation reaction which involves only two oxidizing equivalents, instead of four, could be a nice opportunity to alleviate the challenging multiple charge accumulation step in DSPECs. On this field, the seminal work of Meyer and co-workers was followed by a few other studies, ,, but alcohol oxidation in DSPECs still remains an unexplored scientific topic today, particularly if one compares it with water oxidation. , All the previously reported studies of alcohol oxidation with DSPECs that we are aware of rely on a ruthenium polypyridine complex as the catalyst ,,, and very often with a ruthenium tris-bipyridine-based TiO 2 sensitizer, although a few publications describe systems with an organic sensitizer. ,,, Very recently, an interesting study has reported a DSPEC type photoanode made of a TiO 2 film sensitized by a ruthenium tris-bipyridine complex that depolymerizes lignin with the N -hydroxyphthalimide catalyst solubilized into an acetonitrile-based electrolyte . A catalytic photocurrent density of about 130 μA/cm 2 was measured upon light irradiation (200 mW/cm 2 ) with an applied potential of 0.75 V versus a saturated calomel electrode (SCE).…”