“…+0.3 V. In the base solution, only H 2 O was oxidized at TiO 2 electrode surface by the photogenerated holes, while both H 2 O and organic species were oxidized in organic solutions. The lack of direct relationship between the photocurrent and the actual PEC degradation rate, especially at relatively high potentials, may be explained in the following aspects: ͑i͒ it may be associated with the faster charge transfer rate by field-driven migration, which is dependent on applied potential; ͑ii͒ the ohmic losses decrease the effective potential from the value applied between the reference electrode tip and the current collector at locations around the tip to some extent should also be taken into account; 40 ͑iii͒ most importantly, it should be emphasized that more positive applied potential favors the specific adsorption of Cl − on the surface of TiO 2 nanotube array electrode, and therefore, in situ photoelectrochemical generated active chlorine ͑Cl 2 , HClO, ClO − ͒ as powerful oxidizing species that can diffuse into bulk solution is responsible for the further enhancement of degradation rate of MB with increasing positive applied potential. 39 Because the rate of a heterogeneous photoelectrochemical reaction is proportional to the surface concentration of photogenerated holes and electrons and, in the case of a positively biased TiO 2 catalyst, the electrons flow through the external circuit and the resulting photocurrent density should be analogous to the reaction rate.…”