1972
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.28.738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoelectric Work Function of a Copper Single Crystal for the (100), (110), (111), and (112) Faces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
79
1
23

Year Published

1979
1979
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
16
79
1
23
Order By: Relevance
“…We calculate W Cu = 3.9 eV, which is somewhat lower than the theoretical values, ranging between 4.5 to 5.3 eV, 42 and the experimental value of about 4.65 eV. 43,44 Although the value of the calculated work function depends sensitively on the used parameters, we find that the transmission coefficient does not change significantly. The value for EuO, i.e., W EuO = 1.8 eV, is in good agreement with the experimental value of 1.7 eV.…”
Section: Spin Transport Properties Of the Euo Junction At Zero Biasmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We calculate W Cu = 3.9 eV, which is somewhat lower than the theoretical values, ranging between 4.5 to 5.3 eV, 42 and the experimental value of about 4.65 eV. 43,44 Although the value of the calculated work function depends sensitively on the used parameters, we find that the transmission coefficient does not change significantly. The value for EuO, i.e., W EuO = 1.8 eV, is in good agreement with the experimental value of 1.7 eV.…”
Section: Spin Transport Properties Of the Euo Junction At Zero Biasmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The activation energy required to capture an electron will be associated with the work function. The work function difference between Cu(ll1) and Cu(l IO) (11 [25] to 14 kcaljmol [6]) equals approximately the difference between the activation energies for the NzO decomposition on both planes (12.4 kcal/mol).…”
Section: Discussion Of the No Decompasitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4], the key parameters determining the stability of various charge states are discussed within a simple model. Based on this model, we ascribe the spontaneous decay of the Au 0 and Au þ charge states on NaCl films grown on Cu(311) to the significantly reduced work function of Cu(311) (4.31 eV [27], as compared to 4.59 eV for Cu(100) and 4.94 eV for Cu(111) [28]), which shifts the affinity level of Au 0 for an unrelaxed ion lattice closer to the Fermi level of the Cu(311) substrate (≈0.8 eV above E F [29]). Since this affinity level is phonon broadened, phonon-mediated charging of the Au adatom by an electron tunneling from the Cu(311) substrate through the NaCl film becomes a possible process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%