The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1961
DOI: 10.1364/josa.51.000253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoelectric Mixing As a Spectroscopic Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
2

Year Published

1972
1972
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is split on a polarization independent 50/50 beam splitter, and both parts are directed to individual homodyne measurement setups, which record the S 2 -polarization and S 3 -polarization respectively. This is done by interfering the signal and the local oscillator modes on a beam-splitter and subsequently recording the intensity difference at the beamsplitter output ports [30,43,44]. As long as the local oscillator mode is much brighter than the signal mode, the difference photocurrent I corresponds to…”
Section: Experimental Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is split on a polarization independent 50/50 beam splitter, and both parts are directed to individual homodyne measurement setups, which record the S 2 -polarization and S 3 -polarization respectively. This is done by interfering the signal and the local oscillator modes on a beam-splitter and subsequently recording the intensity difference at the beamsplitter output ports [30,43,44]. As long as the local oscillator mode is much brighter than the signal mode, the difference photocurrent I corresponds to…”
Section: Experimental Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical heterodyne detection 1,2 measures an optical signal wave E cos t by beating it against a second, much more intense ''local oscillator'' wave E 0 cos 0 t at a photodetector. In addition to a large dc current due to the local oscillator the detector produces an oscillating current with a frequency ͉ Ϫ 0 ͉, and an amplitude proportional to the electrical field strength E of the optical signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the FFLDI is able to detect only the 'beating' component which has very low angular frequencies (i.e., ω = ω − ω 0 ). This 'beating' component is usually represented as a power spectrum (S( ω)) and was computed by using the classical method as published by de Mul et al (1995) and previously proposed by Forrester (1961):…”
Section: Monte Carlo Methods and Generation Of The Power Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%