2013
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photodynamic therapyvsradiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s dysplasia: Efficacy, safety and cost-comparison

Abstract: In our experience, RFA had higher rate of CR-D without any serious adverse events and was less costly than PDT for endoscopic treatment of BD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of these complications is also similar to that of RFA [52]. Photosensitivity is common and is unique to patients undergoing PDT.…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapymentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The incidence of these complications is also similar to that of RFA [52]. Photosensitivity is common and is unique to patients undergoing PDT.…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The rates are higher in patients who undergo multiple sessions of PDT, those who have pre-existing strictures and those with longer segments of BE [55]. In a comparison of PDT with RFA, the rate of strictures was much higher in the PDT group than in the RFA group (28.1 vs 4.0%) [52]. Treatments such as oral steroids have not been successful in preventing the development of these strictures, which usually require multiple sessions of endoscopic dilation to treat [57].…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In a comparative nonrandomized study, RFA had less complications and reduced cost compared with PDT for the treatment of BE-related dysplasia. 47 …”
Section: Cryoablationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Radiofrequency ablation was also compared with photodynamic therapy (PDT) in a consecutive series of patients with BE [42]. Complete eradication of dysplasia was achieved in 18/33 patients (54.5%) with PDT and in 47/53 patients (88.7%) with RFA ( P = 0.001) [42].…”
Section: Comparative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete eradication of dysplasia was achieved in 18/33 patients (54.5%) with PDT and in 47/53 patients (88.7%) with RFA ( P = 0.001) [42]. Comparing the results, PDT was five times more costly than RFA and one patient in the PDT group had an esophageal perforation, managed with nonsurgical measures, while no perforation was seen with RFA group [42]. …”
Section: Comparative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%