2009
DOI: 10.3928/15428877-20090430-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photodynamic Therapy for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment: Epidemiological and Clinical Analysis of a Long-Term Study

Abstract: PDT is a safe, long-term treatment for exudative age-related macular degeneration, but it is not definitive because this treatment cannot stop the initial growth of the choroidal neovascularization lesion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delivering PDT to the polypoidal lesions will result in occlusion of the polypoidal lesions and focal choroidal ischemia at the treated areas [35, 36], which may result in further VEGF secretion from the surrounding intact branching vascular network and subsequent recurrence of serosanguinous exudation causing further visual deterioration. Hence, the benefits of combining PDT with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents were strongly emphasized [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delivering PDT to the polypoidal lesions will result in occlusion of the polypoidal lesions and focal choroidal ischemia at the treated areas [35, 36], which may result in further VEGF secretion from the surrounding intact branching vascular network and subsequent recurrence of serosanguinous exudation causing further visual deterioration. Hence, the benefits of combining PDT with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents were strongly emphasized [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 We speculated that changes resulting from PDT treatment, such as photoreceptor degeneration, fibrosis and atrophic changes, might attenuate the visual acuity improvement even if the lesion is inactivated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if demographic and clinical predictors, such as age of patient, baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and baseline CNV dimension, have been evaluated to explain the remarkable heterogeneity of PDT-V outcomes in patients with neovascular AMD 5153 , no unequivocal data were recorded also after the differentiation between different CNV subtypes which are traditionally categorized by fluorescein angiography (FA) in: (i) classic CNV (C-CNV), characterized by a well-demarcated hyperfluorescent area with an hypofluorescent margin in FA early phase and dye leakage obscuring the boundaries of the neovascular lesion during the late phase; (ii) predominantly classic CNV (PC-CNV), with the classic component occupying 50% or more of the entire neovascular lesion that includes occult CNV and all the fluorescence-blocking constituents; (iii) minimally classic CNV (MC-CNV), with the classic component occupying less than 50% of the neovascular complex; (iv) occult CNV (O-CNV), with no classic component 2225 . In fact, within patients treated with PDT-V for AMD-related CNV, other factors appear to be implicated in those differences of therapeutic responsiveness, which are clearly noticeable reviewing the final outcomes of both randomized controlled trials 2226 and real-life clinical studies 5456 . Focusing on a pharmacogenetic predictive approach, our previous investigations have pointed out the role of thrombophilic and anti-thrombophilic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in modifying the result of PDT-V in Caucasian patients with neovascular macular degenerations 5760 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%