Photodocumentation as an emergency department documentation tool in soft tissue infection: a randomized trial

Abstract

Objectives: Current documentation methods for patients with skin and soft tissue infections receiving outpatient parenteral anti-infective therapy (OPAT) include written descriptions and drawings of the infection that may inadequately communicate clinical status. We undertook a study to determine whether photodocumentation (PD) improves the duration of outpatient treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. Methods: A single-blinded, prospective, randomized trial was conducted in the emergency departments of a community hospital and an academic tertiary centre. Participants included consecutive patients age $ 14 years presenting with noninvasive skin and soft tissue infections requiring OPAT. Patients in the intervention arm were treated with standard of care plus PD at each emergency physician assessment. Control subjects received care provided at the discretion of the treating physician and non-photographic documentation. The primary outcome was duration of therapy measured in half-days. The required sample size to detect a difference of one half-day was 253 patients per group (a 5 0.05). Secondary outcomes included (1) completion and therapeutic failure rates, (2) patient satisfaction, and (3) physician and nurse satisfaction. Results: Enrolment was slower and follow-up rates lower than anticipated, and the trial was terminated when funds were exhausted. A total of 468 subjects with similar age and gender characteristics were enrolled, with 244 receiving the intervention and 224 in the control arm. The mean OPAT duration was similar in the two groups (3.6 days v. 3.5 days, p 5 0.73). No differences in the rate for completion and therapeutic failure were observed (71% v. 68% and , 1% for both, respectively). Survey response rates varied significantly: patients, 65%; nurses, 17%; and physicians, 87%. Physicians endorsed more comfort with their assessment and OPAT judgment with PD (65% and 64%, respectively).Physicians cited too much time lost with technological challenges, which would affect implementation in a busy ED. Conclusions: PD as an intervention is acceptable to patients and has reasonable endorsement by the majority of physicians. This trial had significant limitations that threatened the integrity of the study, so the results are inconclusive. RÉ SUMÉObjectif: Les moyens actuels de documentation des infections de la peau et des tissus mous chez les patients soumis à un traitement anti-infectieux parenté ral ambulatoire (TAIPA) comprennent les descriptions é crites et les croquis des tissus infecté s, mais ces moyens peuvent ne pas rendre pleinement l'é tat clinique. Aussi avons-nous mené une é tude visant à dé terminer si la photodocumentation (PD) pouvait amé liorer la duré e du traitement des infections de la peau et des tissus mous chez les patients externes. Mé thode: Un essai prospectif, à ré partition alé atoire, et à simple insu a é té mené au service des urgences d'un hô pital communautaire et d'un centre hospitalier universitaire de soins tertiaires. Ont participé à l'essai des pati...

Electronic Discharge Communication Tools Used in Pediatric Emergency Departments: Systematic Review

“…Overall, the methodological quality of the studies varied: 30% (11/37) of the studies met ≤60% of the criteria outlined by the MMAT (lower methodological quality), and 70% (26/37) of the studies met >60% of the criteria (higher methodological quality) [ 26 ]. Reviewers’ ratings for each methodological quality criterion are presented in Multimedia Appendix 2 [ 28 - 33 , 35 - 39 , 41 - 46 , 49 - 51 , 54 - 66 , 68 , 73 , 74 , 76 ].…”

Recommendations for Better Adoption of Medical Photography as a Clinical Tool

“…Providers from diverse fields use photography to record clinical findings. Physicians have reported that photo documentation improves their patient assessment and enhances confidence in clinical decision-making [ 4 ]. Patients also perceive the value of photographs and generally approve of the use of clinical images in medical records and coordination of care [ 4 , 5 ], a practice that can help avoid repeated or uncomfortable examinations.…”

“…Physicians have reported that photo documentation improves their patient assessment and enhances confidence in clinical decision-making [ 4 ]. Patients also perceive the value of photographs and generally approve of the use of clinical images in medical records and coordination of care [ 4 , 5 ], a practice that can help avoid repeated or uncomfortable examinations. Integration of clinical images when communicating with specialists has also been shown to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis [ 3 , 6 ].…”

Clinical photography on personal mobile devices: a perspective on the issues facing surgeons

“…These studies, alongside our own experiences, support the hypothesis that using PMD for clinical photography is widespread among Australian surgical services, although no dedicated literature exists. Benefits of clinical photography include monitoring of pathology, expedited specialist review for patients in remote settings and limiting the need for patients to repeatedly expose sensitive anatomy 3 . A study investigating the use of clinical photography for monitoring treatment‐response in superficial skin infections found that 65% of physicians reported improved decision‐making capacity when utilizing clinical photography 3 .…”

“…Benefits of clinical photography include monitoring of pathology, expedited specialist review for patients in remote settings and limiting the need for patients to repeatedly expose sensitive anatomy 3 . A study investigating the use of clinical photography for monitoring treatment‐response in superficial skin infections found that 65% of physicians reported improved decision‐making capacity when utilizing clinical photography 3 . Clinical photographs are not limited to patient anatomy and can include photographs of drains, catheters and radiographical images.…”