2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10812-006-0132-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoconversion of 2-methylphenol, 4-methylphenol, and 2-amino-4-methylphenol in water

Abstract: We have used fluorescence spectroscopy to study photoconversions of 2-methylphenol (2-MP), , in water when excited by UV radiation from different sources. We discuss the effect of the acidity of the medium and dissolved oxygen on photoconversions of the indicated methylphenols. The photodegradation efficiency for 2-MP and 4-MP decreases in the absence of oxygen. The photoconversion efficiency for methylphenols in alkaline medium is higher when irradiated by light with λ rad = 283 nm, while in neutral medium i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The krypton chloride (KrCl*) excimer lamps emit narrowly at 222 nm which falls in the so-called far-UVC range of 200–230 nm . Compared to conventional LPUV lamps, the KrCl* lamps have several advantages, including higher photon energy due to the shorter wavelength, the absence of mercury, minimal harm to exposed human tissues and eyes, and output stability at cold temperatures. The 222 nm irradiation has been demonstrated to be highly effective in inactivating pathogens and degrading some organic pollutants. While the VUV also has the advantage of higher photon energy, the strong light absorption of water at 185 nm (ε = 1.61–1.62 cm –1 ) substantially limits light penetration. In contrast, the light absorption of water at 222 nm (ε ∼ 0.001 cm –1 ) is only slightly higher than that at 254 nm .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The krypton chloride (KrCl*) excimer lamps emit narrowly at 222 nm which falls in the so-called far-UVC range of 200–230 nm . Compared to conventional LPUV lamps, the KrCl* lamps have several advantages, including higher photon energy due to the shorter wavelength, the absence of mercury, minimal harm to exposed human tissues and eyes, and output stability at cold temperatures. The 222 nm irradiation has been demonstrated to be highly effective in inactivating pathogens and degrading some organic pollutants. While the VUV also has the advantage of higher photon energy, the strong light absorption of water at 185 nm (ε = 1.61–1.62 cm –1 ) substantially limits light penetration. In contrast, the light absorption of water at 222 nm (ε ∼ 0.001 cm –1 ) is only slightly higher than that at 254 nm .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 22 24 The 222 nm irradiation has been demonstrated to be highly effective in inactivating pathogens 25 27 and degrading some organic pollutants. 28 30 While the VUV also has the advantage of higher photon energy, the strong light absorption of water at 185 nm (ε = 1.61–1.62 cm –1 ) 31 substantially limits light penetration. In contrast, the light absorption of water at 222 nm (ε ∼ 0.001 cm –1 ) is only slightly higher than that at 254 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excilamps can be considered as attractive alternatives to conventional mercury lamps for photochemical purification of water, especially in situations where mercury content is restricted or undesirable. In particular, the photodegradation efficiency of methylphenols with emphasis on possible electronic transitions of the excited molecules was studied using KrCl (222 nm), XeBr (282 nm) and XeCl (308 nm) excilamps [10]. Direct UV photolysis with KrCl and XeBr excilamps has been proven to be very effective for degrading herbicides 2,4-D and 2-methyl-4chlorophenoxyacetic acid in pure water [11], and 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB 153) in hexane [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been determined that KrCl and Xe 2 excilamps are the most promising excilamps for dye decolourization, achieving higher decolourization efficiency in shorter reaction times [26,28]. Although XeCl excilamps have been reported for the removal of organic pollutants in water [29], to our knowledge this UV source has not been reported in the literature for dye decolourization in water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%