The two isomeric cyclopropane derivatives (34) and (35) are formed in a yield of 30-70% together with diethyl fumarate and diethyl maleate. The ratio of ex0 compound to endo compound depends on the substituent R in the phosphite ligand, and decreases as R varies inThis result is interpreted by Moser as follows. The better the acceptor properties of the phosphite ligand on the copper, the greater is the positive charge on the metal, and the stronger, therefore, is the bonding with all the other ligands. The decrease in the bond lengths leads to steric hindrance between the reactant (coordinated cyclohexene) and the phosphite ligand. It is plausible on the basis of a model of the transition state, that this will favor the formation of the endo form.For the 0-and m-substituted phenyl phosphites, a linear relation exists between the ratio log(exo/endo) and the Hammett B values for the substituents R. This indicates that the effects observed are purely electronic in origin. Nevertheless, they ultimately act via the steric hindrance of one of the two possible transition states. The author speaks of stereo-electronic effect. In the case of o-substitution, the values found for (exo/endo) are lower than those expected from the Hammett lines. This purely steric effect shows again that steric hindrance places the ex0 form (34) at a disadvantage in relation to the endo form (35).
ConclusionThe number of systematic studies that have been carried out on the influence of the ligands on the catalytic activity of a transition metal catalyst is still relatively small. As long as a broad experimental basis is lacking, one cannot entirely rule out the possibility of occasional misinterpretations. In this sense, the present review is intended mainly to stimulate interest. We would be content if it led to the initiation of a few systematic studies that might help to deepen our understanding of these relationships, which are so important to the entire field of catalysis on transition metals.