1984
DOI: 10.1063/1.95251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photocapacitance spectroscopy of surface states on indium phosphide photoelectrodes

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inReflection anisotropy spectroscopy, surface photovoltage spectroscopy, and contactless electroreflectance investigation of the InP/In0.53Ga0.47As(001) heterojunction system J.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…51 More compelling is the high density of surface states at 1.2-1.3 eV above the VBM reported for a variety of different chemically treated InP surfaces. [52][53][54] The energetic position of these surface states is in excellent agreement with the pinned position of the Fermi level observed in this work ͑ϳ1.3 eV above the VBM͒. As a result, holes in the valence band of InP would be trapped by the interface states near the Fermi level, and subsequently injected into the HOMO of the adjacent organic layer under applied bias.…”
Section: B Injection From Surface Statessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…51 More compelling is the high density of surface states at 1.2-1.3 eV above the VBM reported for a variety of different chemically treated InP surfaces. [52][53][54] The energetic position of these surface states is in excellent agreement with the pinned position of the Fermi level observed in this work ͑ϳ1.3 eV above the VBM͒. As a result, holes in the valence band of InP would be trapped by the interface states near the Fermi level, and subsequently injected into the HOMO of the adjacent organic layer under applied bias.…”
Section: B Injection From Surface Statessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The Fe presence at the surface has previously been reported to introduce two states, situated at E C Ϫ1.12 eV and E C Ϫ0.79 eV. 14,15 In our case, only the former is observed at room temperature. Low-temperature SPV measurements are expected to yield higher sensitivity to surface charge redistribution.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…This state is attributed to excess surface P. [11][12][13] The downward slope change at 1.12 eV indicates depopulation of an acceptor state, situated at E C Ϫ1.12 eV, ͑denoted by S 1 ͒ and is attributed to unintentional Fe doping. 14,15 The abrupt upward offset at 1.18 eV was verified to appear due to an optical filter change. The next downward slope change indicates depopulation of an acceptor state, situated at E C Ϫ1.25 eV ͑denoted by A 1 ͒ and attributed to adsorbed O.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study utilizes steady-state photocapacitance spectroscopy (9,10) to characterize the semiconductor electrode/electrolyte interface states, to determine the effect of various surface modifications on these states, and to correlate these results to cell performance. This study utilizes steady-state photocapacitance spectroscopy (9,10) to characterize the semiconductor electrode/electrolyte interface states, to determine the effect of various surface modifications on these states, and to correlate these results to cell performance.…”
Section: Journalmentioning
confidence: 99%