2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6em00682e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photobleaching of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in the Yangtze River estuary: kinetics and effects of temperature, pH, and salinity

Abstract: The kinetics and temperature-, pH- and salinity-dependences of photobleaching of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in the Yangtze River estuary (YRE) were evaluated using laboratory solar-simulated irradiation and compared to those of Suwannee River humic substances (SRHSs). Nearly all CDOM in water at the head of the estuary (headwater herein) was photobleachable in both summer and winter, while significant fractions of CDOM (13-29%) were resistant to photobleaching in saltier waters. The photoblea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time‐course CDOM and humic‐like FDOM data are best fit to the equation of Y=R0+Rp*()klab*X, where X (day) stands for irradiation time, Y for a CDOM (330), or C h normalized to the time‐zero value, R 0 for the photobleaching‐resistant fraction of CDOM or humic‐like FDOM, R p for the photobleachable fraction of CDOM or humic‐like FDOM, and k lab (day −1 ) for the photobleaching rate constant of the photobleachable fraction. A similar approach has been used to estimate the photobleachable and photobleaching‐resistant fractions of CDOM in the Yangtze River estuary (Song et al, 2017) and the bio‐labile and bio‐refractory fractions of DOM in coastal oceans (Lønborg & Álvarez‐Salgado, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The time‐course CDOM and humic‐like FDOM data are best fit to the equation of Y=R0+Rp*()klab*X, where X (day) stands for irradiation time, Y for a CDOM (330), or C h normalized to the time‐zero value, R 0 for the photobleaching‐resistant fraction of CDOM or humic‐like FDOM, R p for the photobleachable fraction of CDOM or humic‐like FDOM, and k lab (day −1 ) for the photobleaching rate constant of the photobleachable fraction. A similar approach has been used to estimate the photobleachable and photobleaching‐resistant fractions of CDOM in the Yangtze River estuary (Song et al, 2017) and the bio‐labile and bio‐refractory fractions of DOM in coastal oceans (Lønborg & Álvarez‐Salgado, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Napierian absorption coefficient at wavelength λ (nm), a CDOM ( λ ) (m −1 ), was calculated as 2.303 times the measured absorbance at λ divided by the path length of the cuvette (0.1 m). The detection limit, defined as three times the standard deviation of eight Nanopure water blank measurements, was 0.018 m −1 in the wavelength range from 300–500 nm (Song et al, 2017). The spectral slope coefficient between 275 and 295 nm, S 275–295 (nm −1 ), was calculated according to the method of Helms et al (2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical uncertainty of a CDOM measurement was assessed by analyzing six replicates of the sample collected at station M01 from the August cruise, arriving at a standard deviation of 0.06 m −1 or 1.3 % at 330 nm, with the mean a CDOM at 330 nm (a 330 ) being 4.37 m −1 . In this study we choose a 330 as an indicator of the CDOM abundance, given that this variable has been frequently used for this surrogate role (e.g., Osburn et al, 2009;Gareis et al, 2010;Mann et al, 2012;Song et al, 2017) and that the wavelength of 330 nm is where many aquatic CDOM photoreactions, including photobleaching, exhibit maximum rates in surface water under solar radiation (e.g., Vähätalo et al, 2000;Zhang et al, 2006;White et al, 2010;Xie et al, 2012a). CDOM absorption coefficients at other commonly used wavelengths and the spectral slope coefficient between 300 and 500 nm are presented in Table S2.…”
Section: Dom Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rest was unresolved. Studies on environmental grab samples are mixed; some report no consistent effect, others rate enhancement, and still others rate suppression with increasing salinity (see [ 76 , 77 ]).…”
Section: Involvement Of Halogen Species In Organic Matter Processimentioning
confidence: 99%