Abstract:Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory mucocutaneous disease, affecting 1%-2% of the population at middle age, with a discrete female predominance (Anuradha et al., 2008;Gupta et al., 2013). OLP aetiology is unknown but evidence suggests that this disease is an immune-mediated process orchestrated by CD 4+ and CD 8+ T lymphocytes as well as by diverse inflammatory cytokines that lead to the apoptosis of epithelial cells (Kurago, 2016;Payeras et al., 2013).Reticular OLP represents the most freque… Show more
“…Similar studies were conducted using PBM therapy with the aim of treating OLP [ 21 , 22 ]; however, there is no consent on the exact PBM dosimetry or treatment protocol for the management of erosive OLP. In this context, a randomized double-blind study by Rodrigues et al [ 23 ], showed that the use of PBM can be as effective as corticoid therapy in treating oral lichen planus with no adverse side effects noted. In their study, a 660 nm diode laser was used in a continuous mode with a spot size of 0.283 mm 2 , an output power of 100 mW with a 5 s of exposure time per point and 0.5 J of total energy per point twice a week for 4 weeks and for a total of eight sessions [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, a randomized double-blind study by Rodrigues et al [ 23 ], showed that the use of PBM can be as effective as corticoid therapy in treating oral lichen planus with no adverse side effects noted. In their study, a 660 nm diode laser was used in a continuous mode with a spot size of 0.283 mm 2 , an output power of 100 mW with a 5 s of exposure time per point and 0.5 J of total energy per point twice a week for 4 weeks and for a total of eight sessions [ 23 ]. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Wang et al [ 12 ] argues that although PBM is proving to be a reliable alternative to topical corticosteroids, additional long-term randomized clinical trials and well-designed RCTs with long-term periods are still recommended to consolidate the effectiveness of PBM [ 12 ].…”
Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy is a promising approach for the management of inflammatory conditions and autoimmune lesions, such as oral lichen planus (OLP). The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the effectiveness of PBM in the management of painful and erosive/ulcerative OLP and to compare it with the standard of care that is the topical application of corticosteroids. 96 patients were included with erosive and painful OLP. 48 patients received PBM therapy and 48 received corticosteroids. Data was collected retrospectively on pain using the visual analogue scale; clinical aspects of lesions were assessed with the REU score, and the recurrence rate was noted. One session of PBM therapy with a helium-neon red light (635 nm) was carried out every 48 h for 6 weeks. Treatments were mainly made in contact mode, using a fiber with a diameter of 600 µm (0.6 mm). The output power of the laser beam was calibrated by a power meter. A delivered power of 0.1 W was used for 40 s in a continuous wave (CW), corresponding to a delivered energy of 4 J. The delivered energy density related to the fiber diameter was 1415 J/cm2. Each treated point was considered as 1 cm2 of diameter. PBM therapy within these parameters was carried out on each point until the totality of the lesion was covered, including the non-erosive OLP area. Furthermore, healthy mucosa within 5 mm of the lesion was also irradiated with the same conditions. This PBM treatment was performed during 6 consecutive weeks. The topical corticosteroid treatment consisted of cortisone application to cover the OLP 3 times/day for 6 weeks. Follow-up was made at 6 weeks and at 3, 6 and 12 months. After 6 weeks, both groups showed complete absence of pain, and a complete disappearance of ulcerative/erosive areas. No significant difference was found for both groups concerning the recurrence rate of erosive OLP during the follow-up period; values were 0% at 6 weeks for both groups and 79% and 87.5% for the corticosteroid and PBM group, respectively, at 12 months of follow-up. PBM is effective for managing OLP and is significantly similar to topical corticosteroids without any need for the use of medication and with no reported side effects.
“…Similar studies were conducted using PBM therapy with the aim of treating OLP [ 21 , 22 ]; however, there is no consent on the exact PBM dosimetry or treatment protocol for the management of erosive OLP. In this context, a randomized double-blind study by Rodrigues et al [ 23 ], showed that the use of PBM can be as effective as corticoid therapy in treating oral lichen planus with no adverse side effects noted. In their study, a 660 nm diode laser was used in a continuous mode with a spot size of 0.283 mm 2 , an output power of 100 mW with a 5 s of exposure time per point and 0.5 J of total energy per point twice a week for 4 weeks and for a total of eight sessions [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, a randomized double-blind study by Rodrigues et al [ 23 ], showed that the use of PBM can be as effective as corticoid therapy in treating oral lichen planus with no adverse side effects noted. In their study, a 660 nm diode laser was used in a continuous mode with a spot size of 0.283 mm 2 , an output power of 100 mW with a 5 s of exposure time per point and 0.5 J of total energy per point twice a week for 4 weeks and for a total of eight sessions [ 23 ]. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Wang et al [ 12 ] argues that although PBM is proving to be a reliable alternative to topical corticosteroids, additional long-term randomized clinical trials and well-designed RCTs with long-term periods are still recommended to consolidate the effectiveness of PBM [ 12 ].…”
Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy is a promising approach for the management of inflammatory conditions and autoimmune lesions, such as oral lichen planus (OLP). The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the effectiveness of PBM in the management of painful and erosive/ulcerative OLP and to compare it with the standard of care that is the topical application of corticosteroids. 96 patients were included with erosive and painful OLP. 48 patients received PBM therapy and 48 received corticosteroids. Data was collected retrospectively on pain using the visual analogue scale; clinical aspects of lesions were assessed with the REU score, and the recurrence rate was noted. One session of PBM therapy with a helium-neon red light (635 nm) was carried out every 48 h for 6 weeks. Treatments were mainly made in contact mode, using a fiber with a diameter of 600 µm (0.6 mm). The output power of the laser beam was calibrated by a power meter. A delivered power of 0.1 W was used for 40 s in a continuous wave (CW), corresponding to a delivered energy of 4 J. The delivered energy density related to the fiber diameter was 1415 J/cm2. Each treated point was considered as 1 cm2 of diameter. PBM therapy within these parameters was carried out on each point until the totality of the lesion was covered, including the non-erosive OLP area. Furthermore, healthy mucosa within 5 mm of the lesion was also irradiated with the same conditions. This PBM treatment was performed during 6 consecutive weeks. The topical corticosteroid treatment consisted of cortisone application to cover the OLP 3 times/day for 6 weeks. Follow-up was made at 6 weeks and at 3, 6 and 12 months. After 6 weeks, both groups showed complete absence of pain, and a complete disappearance of ulcerative/erosive areas. No significant difference was found for both groups concerning the recurrence rate of erosive OLP during the follow-up period; values were 0% at 6 weeks for both groups and 79% and 87.5% for the corticosteroid and PBM group, respectively, at 12 months of follow-up. PBM is effective for managing OLP and is significantly similar to topical corticosteroids without any need for the use of medication and with no reported side effects.
“…Although the connection between OLP and HSV-1 remains unclear, the use of oral acyclovir in OLP patients has been shown to be beneficial. Aside from antiviral agents, some unexplored variables, such as probiotics [ 25 ] and photobiomodulation [ 26 ], should be considered in future clinical trials for OLP patients. This approach demonstrated promising results by modifying clinical and microbiological parameters in the oral environment that may also affect the response to OLP.…”
Patient: Male, 73-year-old
Final Diagnosis: Oral lichen planus (OLP)
Symptoms: Painful tongue • taste impairment
Medication: Acyclovir • antiseptic • corticosteroids • folic acid • vitamin B12
Clinical Procedure: DASS test • medications • OHIP test • serological examinations
Specialty: Dentistry • General and Internal Medicine • Pathology
Objective:
Unusual setting of medical care
Background:
Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the oral mucosa, associated with the T-cell activity that mediates an autoimmune condition, with various predisposing factors, such as herpes simplex virus (HSV). The first-line treatment is topical corticosteroids. However, additional therapy can be given according to the underlying factors. This report assessed the efficacy of oral acyclovir as adjuvant therapy in the management of OLP.
Case Report:
A 73-year-old man came to our unit reporting he had recurring sores on the tongue for the past 10 years. The tongue was painful and there was taste impairment. Intraoral examination showed erosion and erythematous areas surrounded by white net-like plaques on the tongue and buccal mucosa, as well as depapillation on 2/3 dorsal anterior of the tongue. The diagnosis of reticular and erosive OLP was determined based on clinical features. The patient was prescribed topical corticosteroids, multivitamins, and mouthwash containing chlorine dioxide. Supporting examinations were performed to rule out systemic predisposing factors. The patient was referred for anti-HSV-1 IgG testing, and it was reactive (34.8 U/mL). Thus, oral acyclovir was prescribed. After 2 weeks of antiviral treatment, the tongue pain and altered taste were resolved, and the clinical features showed significant improvement.
Conclusions:
Management of OLP requires a comprehensive approach. OLP symptoms can be relieved if treatment is not only limited to reducing the inflammation but also seeks to remedy other comorbidities, in this case, administration of an antiviral agent to resolve the HSV-1 involvement.
“…Clinical OLP symptoms were identified in terms of the modified criteria. Clinical and function scores of OLP individuals were evaluated according to the previous investigation 25 . Signed informed consents were received from participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical and function scores of OLP individuals were evaluated according to the previous investigation. 25 Signed informed consents were received from participants. All human studies were approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Shanxi Medical University.…”
Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) is reported to exert vital functions in inflammatory responses and autoimmune diseases. Nevertheless, the status and roles of STING in oral lichen planus (OLP) remain elusive. Here, we state that STING and its downstream cytokine interferon‐β (IFNβ) expression is boosted in the oral keratinocytes from patients suffering OLP in comparison with those from healthy participants. Mechanistically, transcription factor GATA‐binding protein 1 (GATA1) which is highly increased in diseased samples specifically interacts with its element in the promoter of STING to enhance STING transcripts. 1,25(OH)2D3, the active form of vitamin D, is capable of restricting STING and IFNβ increases in oral keratinocyte models resembling OLP in vitro. Moreover, there is a negative correlation between vitamin D receptor (VDR) and STING or IFNβ in human samples. Using plasmids and small interfering RNA transfection technologies, we find 1,25(OH)2D3 regulates STING and IFNβ through a mechanism controlled by the hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α)‐GATA1 axis. Collectively, our findings unveil that 1,25(OH)2D3 lowers STING and IFNβ overexpression in the context of OLP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.