2009
DOI: 10.1021/am800196r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoactive Hybrid Nanomaterials: Indocyanine Immobilized in Mesoporous MCM-41 for “In-Cell” Bioimaging

Abstract: Mesoporous silica nanoparticles are being explored as versatile tools for various biomedical and biotechnological applications including disease diagnosis, drug delivery, and intracellular imaging. In this paper, the synthesis and characterization of a fluorescent hybrid mesoporous silica nanomaterial, which is noncytotoxic and shows great potential for "in-cell" bioimaging applications, will be described. The hybrid mesoporous material has been obtained by confining highly fluorescent organic dyes, belonging … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(73 reference statements)
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23,42 Size is particularly critical for intracellular traff icking and the f inal destination of endocytosed nanoparticles, given that endocytic compartments range between 300 nm and 1000 nm. 5 Both the 1000 nm and 50 nm amine-modified polystyrene nanoparticles were toxic to ovarian cancer cells, while 10 nm and 50 nm mesoporous silica and 30 nm carboxyl-modified polystyrene nanoparticles exerted no toxic effects on metabolism in ovarian cancer cells, consistent with previous reports showing the biotolerability of mesoporous silica 19,30,37,43 and carboxylated polystyrene 27,29,44 nanoparticles in other cell types. The potentially deleterious effects of nanoparticles on cell metabolism depend on their physicochemical characteristics, uptake efficiency, and final intracellular destination, as well as their accumulation in critical compartments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23,42 Size is particularly critical for intracellular traff icking and the f inal destination of endocytosed nanoparticles, given that endocytic compartments range between 300 nm and 1000 nm. 5 Both the 1000 nm and 50 nm amine-modified polystyrene nanoparticles were toxic to ovarian cancer cells, while 10 nm and 50 nm mesoporous silica and 30 nm carboxyl-modified polystyrene nanoparticles exerted no toxic effects on metabolism in ovarian cancer cells, consistent with previous reports showing the biotolerability of mesoporous silica 19,30,37,43 and carboxylated polystyrene 27,29,44 nanoparticles in other cell types. The potentially deleterious effects of nanoparticles on cell metabolism depend on their physicochemical characteristics, uptake efficiency, and final intracellular destination, as well as their accumulation in critical compartments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[26][27][28][29] In this work, we analyzed the mechanism of entry, intracellular trafficking, final localization, and biocompatibility of fluorescently labeled mesoporous silica and polystyrene nanoparticles differing in size and surface charge of chemical groups in ovarian cancer cells. In a first set of experiments, we compared mesoporous silica nanoparticles 10 ± 5 nm diameter, naked (ie, no surface-charged functional group), and doped with IRIS-3 dye emitting red fluorescence, 30 with commercial polystyrene nanoparticles 30 ± 10 nm in diameter, carboxyl-modified with a negative surface charge, and embedded with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) dye emitting green fluorescence. In a second set of experiments, to get a preliminary insight into the impact of size and surface charge groups, we further tested the biocompatibility, uptake, and subcellular localization of mesoporous silica and polystyrene nanoparticles 50 nm in diameter and functionalized (or not) with amine or carboxyl groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 However, it should be noted that at high loadings dye molecules such as Rubpy can selfquench, resulting in a quantum yield reduction. 29,30,37,38 The quantum yields of silica encapsulated TMR-Dex and TMR-APTES were determined to be ∼1.3 and 3.55 times higher than quantum yields of the TMR-Dex and TMR-APTES molecules in water, respectively. The effect of silica encapsulation on the quantum yield of the three dyes will be discussed in detail below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[28][29][30] The actual, experimentally optimized, ratio varied from ∼40:1 for Rubpy, through ∼930:1 for TMR-Dex, to ∼125 000:1 for TMR-APTES reflecting the effectiveness of encapsulation and/or strength of dye-silica interaction on going from Rubpy to TMRDex and to TMR-APTES.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 The RBL cell model has already been successfully used in studies of endocytosis and cellular labeling with NPs. [25][26][27] RBL cells represent a valuable cellular model system to address the two questions posed in the present study: (1) do NPs trigger an inflammatory response, ie, the calcium-dependent secretion of mastocyte granules? And (2) can NPs be used to label, and possibly discriminate between different internal secretory, lysosomelike compartments of mastocytes?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%