2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2022.101522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoacoustic imaging reveals mechanisms of rapid-acting insulin formulations dynamics at the injection site

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first 60 minutes, the area occupied by the antibody increased by 10 – 15% (Figure 2c). This is in stark contrast to a smaller size dye-labeled insulin lispro (∼ 6.8 kDa) in Humalog formulation, whose area was reported to increase by 50 – 60% in the first 60 minutes using the same photoacoustic imaging technique [20]. After 24 hours, the area occupied by the antibody is roughly four times the initial area following injection (Figure 2d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first 60 minutes, the area occupied by the antibody increased by 10 – 15% (Figure 2c). This is in stark contrast to a smaller size dye-labeled insulin lispro (∼ 6.8 kDa) in Humalog formulation, whose area was reported to increase by 50 – 60% in the first 60 minutes using the same photoacoustic imaging technique [20]. After 24 hours, the area occupied by the antibody is roughly four times the initial area following injection (Figure 2d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We designed and employed a triple-wavelength equipped OR-PAM (Figure 1c) to study the near-infrared light absorbing sulfo-cy7.5 dye-labeled IgG4 isotype control antibody in the mouse ear. Our initial efforts to quantify the injection site absorption kinetics of the dye-labeled IgG4 antibody through photoacoustic imaging using the previously reported method were unsuccessful (SI, Figures S1b and S1c) [20]. The results suggested less than 25% of the dye-labeled antibody disappeared from the injection site after the first 3 hours; however, at 6 hours and 24 hours’ time points, the total photoacoustic signal was higher than the total signal just after injection (i.e., at 3 minutes), which could not be the true reflection of the injection site kinetics of the antibody.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this report, we use optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (OR-PAM) (Figure 1a) [29] to simultaneously image blood and lymphatic vessels along with peripheral nerves and sebaceous glands at cellular-level resolution in the mouse ear skin. We used photoacoustic imaging to visualize blood (label-free); however, to image lymphatic vessels, sebaceous glands, and axonal peripheral nerves, we subcutaneously injected the near-infrared light absorbing sulfo-cy7.5 dye-labeled monoclonal human IgG4 isotype control antibody.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioimaging is the most widely used application of photoacoustic effect and it has gained success in both preclinical and clinical imaging right from imaging anatomical structures, studying drugs, imaging tumors, imaging cellular structures, imaging neuronal function, and histology. [38][39][40][41][42][43] One of the significant advantages of photoacoustic imaging over fluorescence imaging is that it has a higher resolution to depth ratio thus allowing imaging of deeper biological structures at a greater resolution. 36 Given that different biomolecules have unique chemical compositions and light absorption fingerprints, photoacoustic imaging has been employed to image a wide range of biological structures from DNA to lipids to proteins.…”
Section: Photoacoustic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%