1984
DOI: 10.1080/10236248409387041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photic Behaviour and Vertical Migration in Herring Larvae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
23
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(28 reference statements)
4
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Champalbert et al (1991) confirmed such phototactic sign switching in S. solea larvae. Our red drum threshold phototaxis intensities cannot be compared with those reported by Blaxter (1968aBlaxter ( , b, 1969, Wales (1984) and Champalbert et al (1991), because (1) it is not possible to convert photometric units (meter-candles and luxes of white light used by Blaxter and Wales) to radiometric units (photons) or convert from watts of white light of unknown emission spectrum (used by Champalbert et al 1991) to photons, (2) the relative emission spectra of the light sources are not likely to be the same, and (3) the different species do not necessarily exhibit similar action spectra for phototaxis. We can say, however, that all these phototactically tested fish exhibit negative responses at very low light levels and positive responses at higher intensities.…”
Section: Light Intensity (Pe M-2 S-')contrasting
confidence: 41%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More recently, Champalbert et al (1991) confirmed such phototactic sign switching in S. solea larvae. Our red drum threshold phototaxis intensities cannot be compared with those reported by Blaxter (1968aBlaxter ( , b, 1969, Wales (1984) and Champalbert et al (1991), because (1) it is not possible to convert photometric units (meter-candles and luxes of white light used by Blaxter and Wales) to radiometric units (photons) or convert from watts of white light of unknown emission spectrum (used by Champalbert et al 1991) to photons, (2) the relative emission spectra of the light sources are not likely to be the same, and (3) the different species do not necessarily exhibit similar action spectra for phototaxis. We can say, however, that all these phototactically tested fish exhibit negative responses at very low light levels and positive responses at higher intensities.…”
Section: Light Intensity (Pe M-2 S-')contrasting
confidence: 41%
“…However. Wales (1975Wales ( , 1984, using a method similar to that of Blaxter (1968a), tested for and found no phototactic evidence of such a system in blinded Clupea harengus and Pleuronectes platessa larvae, although he did find evidence of extraretinal photosensitivity when larvae were allowed to migrate vertically in response to overhead light cues. It is possible that negative phototaxis at low intensities is rod-mediated (assuming rod development at this stage) while positive phototaxis at higher intensities is cone-mediated, or that different cone systems are controlling these responses.…”
Section: Light Intensity (Pe M-2 S-')mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main input parameter to this algorithm seems to be illumination (Huse 1992), and a number of investigations have described positive and negative phototaxis in marine fish larvae (e.g. : Bulowsky & Meade 1983, Corassa & Nickurn 1981, Naas & Mangor-Jensen 1990, Wales 1984. Accordingly, illumination preference in different marine fish larvae, both in relation to vertical positioning (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, illumination preference in different marine fish larvae, both in relation to vertical positioning (e.g. : Blaxter 1973, Matthews 1984, Swenson and Matson 1976, Wales 1984 and fl!St feeding (e.g. : Batty 1987, Batty et al 1990, Ellertsen et al 1980) is extensively investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%