2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903642106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain by TFIIH kinase is not essential for transcription of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome

Abstract: Ser-5 phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) C-terminal domain by TFIIH kinase has been implicated in critical steps in mRNA synthesis, such as Pol II promoter escape and mRNA 5 -capping. However, the general requirement and precise role of TFIIH kinase in Pol II transcription still remain elusive. Here we use a chemical genetics approach to show that, for a majority of budding-yeast genes, specific inhibition of the yeast TFIIH kinase results in a dramatic reduction in both mRNA level and Ser-5 C-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(29 reference statements)
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Pol IIO was indistinguishable from that generated with the yeast TFIIK kinase, a subcomplex of TFIIH (supplemental Fig. S1B), which is responsible for in vivo phosphorylation of the CTD and the recruitment of CE (29,54). As such, the Pol IIO generated in vitro was suitable for binding studies with CE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The Pol IIO was indistinguishable from that generated with the yeast TFIIK kinase, a subcomplex of TFIIH (supplemental Fig. S1B), which is responsible for in vivo phosphorylation of the CTD and the recruitment of CE (29,54). As such, the Pol IIO generated in vitro was suitable for binding studies with CE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These interactions and others noted above underlie the proposal of a transcription elongation checkpoint that ensures a temporal window for capping of nascent mRNAs (27,35,36,45). The checkpoint model is attractive insofar as there is evidence that positive and negative regulation of transcription can occur at the step of capping enzyme recruitment (6,12) and that either diminished cap guanylylation activity or defective installation of the guanylyltransferase-recruiting Ser5-PO 4 Pol II CTD mark can result in the production of uncapped transcripts that suffer premature 5Ј exonucleolytic decay (20,41). However, recent studies highlight that the putative checkpoint is either not enforced or not required on a large fraction of cellular transcription units.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inherently plastic CTD structure is sculpted by cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) that have various positional specificities and act at different stages of the transcription cycle. The Cdk7 kinase (a component of transcription factor TFIIH) acts at or shortly after initiation to install Ser5-PO 4 and Ser7-PO 4 marks on the CTD (1), of which Ser5-PO 4 is a critical determinant of capping enzyme recruitment and mRNA capping in vivo (20,22,49).Capping enzymes may also access the transcription complex by binding to the Pol II elongation factor Spt5 (32, 52). Spt5 is a large polypeptide (ϳ1,000 to 1,200 amino acids [aa]) composed of multiple domain modules, including a distinctive Cterminal repeat domain (the "Spt5 CTD") that directly binds RNA capping enzymes and is targeted for threonine phosphorylation by the Cdk9 protein kinase (33, 56).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Expression data was normalized through quantile normalization and Robust Multichip Average (RMA) algorithm. 26 To visualize overall changes in gene expression MA plots were generated, where X axis represents the average of log2 expression of control and test samples and Y axis corresponds to ratio of log2 expression value of test to control. Fold changes in expression for 24,000 genes were calculated for each nanoparticle relative to untreated control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%