2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorylation of IRF8 in a pre-associated complex with Spi-1/PU.1 and non-phosphorylated Stat1 is critical for LPS induction of the IL1B gene

Abstract: Rapid induction of transcription is known to be mediated by factors which bind DNA following post-translational modification. We report here that non-tyrosine phosphorylated (NTP)-Stat1 is involved in a cooperative interaction with Spi-1/PU.1 and IRF8 to form a pre-associated, poised complex for IL1B gene induction. A double point mutation at a putative STAT binding site, which overlaps this composite Spi-1 x IRF8 site located in the LPS and IL-1 response element (LILRE), inhibited human IL1B LPS-dependent rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies revealed that IRF8 in conjunction with IRF-1 and IRF-2 negatively regulated some interferon-inducible gene via binding to interferon-stimulated response element, [41][42][43] whereas IRF8, together with PU.1, stimulated the activity of promoters harboring Ets-IRF composite element. 42,[44][45][46][47][48] It is conceivable to speculate that one mode of IRF8 action could be to suppress the expression of a cohort of neutrophilspecific genes and, at the same time, activate a group of macrophagespecific genes via interaction with different partners. This postulation correlates with the findings that macrophage formation requires high PU.1 activity in mammalian culture cells 49 and zebrafish (H.L., Z.L., unpublished data, January 2010), and forced expression of Irf8 alone in pu.1 knockdown embryos is insufficient to restore macrophage development ( Figure 6H-P).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies revealed that IRF8 in conjunction with IRF-1 and IRF-2 negatively regulated some interferon-inducible gene via binding to interferon-stimulated response element, [41][42][43] whereas IRF8, together with PU.1, stimulated the activity of promoters harboring Ets-IRF composite element. 42,[44][45][46][47][48] It is conceivable to speculate that one mode of IRF8 action could be to suppress the expression of a cohort of neutrophilspecific genes and, at the same time, activate a group of macrophagespecific genes via interaction with different partners. This postulation correlates with the findings that macrophage formation requires high PU.1 activity in mammalian culture cells 49 and zebrafish (H.L., Z.L., unpublished data, January 2010), and forced expression of Irf8 alone in pu.1 knockdown embryos is insufficient to restore macrophage development ( Figure 6H-P).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, several transcription factors, including IRF8, Pu.1, nonphosphorylated STAT1, and C/EBPb, were described to be constitutively bound to the IL-1b promoter and/or enhancer elements, enabling rapid gene transcription upon cellular activation (6,34,(43)(44)(45). Recruitment of NF-kB is one of the crucial steps for initiating IL-1b transcription after stimulation (4)(5)(6)46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IRF9 nuclear localization signal is contained within the DNA binding domain and is conserved in IRF8 and IRF4 (50), and it is possible that these IRFs could be inducibly retained by STAT1 in the cytoplasm of macrophages, upon S727 phosphorylation. In support of such a mechanism, IRF8 was reported to bind to nontyrosine-phosphorylated STAT1 (51). Other IRF family members are also candidates.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 94%