2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2016.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorus removal from aquaculture effluents at the Northeast Fishery Center in Lamar, Pennsylvania using iron oxide sorption media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors concluded that knowledge and understanding of the IMTA system is very important factor in order to achieve maximum optimization of methods used in culture as well as techniques to be considered with the aim of reducing aquaculture impacts on the environment. Three different iron oxide-based sorption media samples for removal of phosphorus (P) from fish hatchery effluents studied by Sibrell and Kehler (2016) using the process of fixed bed. Media samples were derived from residuals produced by the treatment of acid mine drainage were compared to granular ferric hydroxide (GFH), which is a commercially available sorption medium.…”
Section: Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors concluded that knowledge and understanding of the IMTA system is very important factor in order to achieve maximum optimization of methods used in culture as well as techniques to be considered with the aim of reducing aquaculture impacts on the environment. Three different iron oxide-based sorption media samples for removal of phosphorus (P) from fish hatchery effluents studied by Sibrell and Kehler (2016) using the process of fixed bed. Media samples were derived from residuals produced by the treatment of acid mine drainage were compared to granular ferric hydroxide (GFH), which is a commercially available sorption medium.…”
Section: Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the P removal structure was developed. Phosphorus removal structures are landscape-scale dissolved P filters containing PSMs that have shown to be effective at trapping dissolved P in non-point source drainage and wastewater [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Briefly, a P removal structure distributes P-rich water over a bed of PSMs and forces it to flow through the PSMs at a rate high enough to treat all water produced from large flow events, while also allowing sufficient contact time for P removal reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One solution is to design structures that flow from the bottom-upward [30], thereby allowing for any given depth of PSM, where the elevation of water inflow equals the elevation of treated outflow water (i.e., hydraulic head equals depth of media). Although several studies have utilized a bottom-up flow regime for slag and other PSMs [22,39,[44][45][46][47], none were utilized on buried tile drains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of existing regeneration treatments is reported by Sibrell and Kehler [18], in which they tested a regeneration treatment on granular ferric hydroxide media samples, after an extensive P removal trial to remediate trout wastewater. The authors used 0.5 M NaOH solution in a 24-h recirculation.…”
Section: Desorption Of P From Al/fe-rich Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%