1974
DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1974.tb03666.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorus Regeneration in Fresh‐Water Paramecia*

Abstract: SYNOPSIS Turnover rates of soluble phosphorus (P) by Paramecium multimicronucleatum were compared under 3 temperature regimes. Phosphorus uptake by this heterotroph was almost completely dependent on consumption of bacteria rather than direct uptake of soluble 32PO4. Phosphorus uptake rates by P. bursaria when in its autotrophic state (a symbiotic relationship with zoochlorellae) and when in its heterotrophic (bacteria feeding) state were also compared. Paramecium bursaria showed a much higher uptake of P when… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(4 reference statements)
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies have been confined to the temperate zone (Pace, 1982;Hunt & Chein, 1983;Gates, 1984;Gates & Lewg, 1984), and detailed data for a trophic gradient of lakes within the same geographical regions are clearly lacking. Ciliated protozoa can be a major microzooplankton component (Bays & Crisman, 1983;Pace, 1986), and their potential for nutrient regeneration within the water column has been recognized (Buechler & Dillon, 1965;Taylor & Lean, 1981). Several investigators in the temperate region suggest that temporal changes in ciliate populations are due to availability of food resources which are spatially enhanced by intense hypolimnetic microbial activity associated with thermal stratification (Pace & Orcutt, 1981;Pace, 1982;Psenner & Schlott-Idl, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have been confined to the temperate zone (Pace, 1982;Hunt & Chein, 1983;Gates, 1984;Gates & Lewg, 1984), and detailed data for a trophic gradient of lakes within the same geographical regions are clearly lacking. Ciliated protozoa can be a major microzooplankton component (Bays & Crisman, 1983;Pace, 1986), and their potential for nutrient regeneration within the water column has been recognized (Buechler & Dillon, 1965;Taylor & Lean, 1981). Several investigators in the temperate region suggest that temporal changes in ciliate populations are due to availability of food resources which are spatially enhanced by intense hypolimnetic microbial activity associated with thermal stratification (Pace & Orcutt, 1981;Pace, 1982;Psenner & Schlott-Idl, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative predictions of crustacean biomass can be made from indices of lake trophy, and numerous studies indicate that ciliated protozoa constitute a signif% cant portion of the microzooplankton community (Pace, 1986;Bays and C&man, 1983;Pace and Orcutt, 198 1). The smaller size and higher metabolic rate of ciliates dictate a substantial role in nutrient regeneration within the water column (Taylor and Lean, 1981;Buechler and Dillon, 1965), but only recently have protozoa been considered as a major link in the limnetic food web (Porter et al, 1979). Unfortunately, the taxonomic shifts within the ciliated microzooplankton community associated with increasing eutrophication have been described only generally (Beaver & Crisman, 1982), and their importance in food chain dynamics remains speculative (Beaver and Crisman, 1988a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were criticized by Barsdate et al (1974) and Fenchel & Harrison (1976) on the grounds that bacteria rather than Protozoa were the main regenerators of nutrients and that the prime function of Protozoa was to keep bacteria in a state of 'physiological youth'. Additionally, Taylor & Lean (1981) argued that phosphorus turnover times for ciliates were significantly greater than those attained by Johannes (1965) and Buechler & Dillon (1974), and that, in general, the efficiency of nutrient incorporation by Protozoa was greater than that of Metazoa. The recent evidence that bacteria play a key role in recycling phosphorus from dissolved nucleotides (Ammerman & Azam 1985) has added further uncertainty as to which group of microbes plays the major role in regenerating nutrients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%