Abstract:Phosphorus (P), an essential structural and functional component of all living organisms, is considered to be the ultimate limiting nutrient in marine ecosystems. To optimize its acquisition, marine species such as protozoa, sponges, foraminifera, clams, and reef corals, among others, have entered symbiotic relationships with algae, which recycle waste products of the animal host and transform dissolved inorganic nutrients into organic molecules, making them bioavailable to their host. Such associations provid… Show more
“…() recently showed that the direct transfer of fixed N and heterotrophic ingestion of diazotrophs provides a non‐negligible and important N source for Symbiodinium . This uptake of additional N from N 2 fixation can explain the observed 40% increase in the N:P ratio in Symbiodinium cells in the current study, which are in general constant (Ferrier‐Pagès, Godinot, D'Angelo, Wiedenmann, & Grover, ). Further, the shift in algal symbiont nutrient stoichiometry suggests that excess N uptake released Symbiodinium from their N‐limited state, an important regulatory mechanism maintaining the coral–algae symbiosis (Falkowski et al., ).…”
The disruption of the coral-algae symbiosis (coral bleaching) due to rising sea surface temperatures has become an unprecedented global threat to coral reefs. Despite decades of research, our ability to manage mass bleaching events remains hampered by an incomplete mechanistic understanding of the processes involved. In this study, we induced a coral bleaching phenotype in the absence of heat and light stress by adding sugars. The sugar addition resulted in coral symbiotic breakdown accompanied by a fourfold increase of coral-associated microbial nitrogen fixation. Concomitantly, increased N:P ratios by the coral host and algal symbionts suggest excess availability of nitrogen and a disruption of the nitrogen limitation within the coral holobiont. As nitrogen fixation is similarly stimulated in ocean warming scenarios, here we propose a refined coral bleaching model integrating the cascading effects of stimulated microbial nitrogen fixation. This model highlights the putative role of nitrogen-fixing microbes in coral holobiont functioning and breakdown.
“…() recently showed that the direct transfer of fixed N and heterotrophic ingestion of diazotrophs provides a non‐negligible and important N source for Symbiodinium . This uptake of additional N from N 2 fixation can explain the observed 40% increase in the N:P ratio in Symbiodinium cells in the current study, which are in general constant (Ferrier‐Pagès, Godinot, D'Angelo, Wiedenmann, & Grover, ). Further, the shift in algal symbiont nutrient stoichiometry suggests that excess N uptake released Symbiodinium from their N‐limited state, an important regulatory mechanism maintaining the coral–algae symbiosis (Falkowski et al., ).…”
The disruption of the coral-algae symbiosis (coral bleaching) due to rising sea surface temperatures has become an unprecedented global threat to coral reefs. Despite decades of research, our ability to manage mass bleaching events remains hampered by an incomplete mechanistic understanding of the processes involved. In this study, we induced a coral bleaching phenotype in the absence of heat and light stress by adding sugars. The sugar addition resulted in coral symbiotic breakdown accompanied by a fourfold increase of coral-associated microbial nitrogen fixation. Concomitantly, increased N:P ratios by the coral host and algal symbionts suggest excess availability of nitrogen and a disruption of the nitrogen limitation within the coral holobiont. As nitrogen fixation is similarly stimulated in ocean warming scenarios, here we propose a refined coral bleaching model integrating the cascading effects of stimulated microbial nitrogen fixation. This model highlights the putative role of nitrogen-fixing microbes in coral holobiont functioning and breakdown.
“…A T was indeed the strongest predictor for both G net and G budget , alone explaining more than half of the variation in reef growth rates in the present study. Interestingly, our study also identifies PO 4 3− concentration, an essential macronutrient and important source of energy for primary producers and reef calcifiers (Ferrier-Pagès et al, 2016), to be a strong abiotic correlate of reef growth. While an overload of inorganic nutrients can be detrimental for the calcification process (Fabricius, 2005; Tambutté et al, 2011), our results show that in a highly oligotrophic reef system, such as the Red Sea, reef growth might be positively affected by seasonal increases in PO 4 3− levels.…”
15The coral structural framework is crucial for maintaining reef ecosystem function and services.
16In the central Red Sea, a naturally high alkalinity is beneficial to reef growth, but rising water
27Despite these calcification-favorable carbonate system conditions, G net and G budget encompassed 28 positive (offshore) and negative net-production (midshore-lagoon and exposed nearshore site)
“…, Ferrier‐Pages et al. ), but we still know relatively little about how these processes transcend to the ecosystem scale. To improve understanding of these processes at larger scales of organization, exhaustive knowledge of all the components that underpin a coral reef nutrient budget is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human activities are altering the nutrient budgets of coral reefs worldwide, through myriad ways, but the mechanisms that underlie these interactions remain poorly understood (Szmant 2002). Recent research is improving understanding of coral-nutrient interactions at the organismlevel (Wiedenmann et al 2013, Ferrier-Pages et al 2016), but we still know relatively little about how these processes transcend to the ecosystem scale. To improve understanding of these processes at larger scales of organization, exhaustive knowledge of all the components that underpin a coral reef nutrient budget is needed.…”
Nutrient subsidies are essential for the functioning of many ecosystems. A long‐standing conundrum in coral reef ecology is how these systems can be among the most productive globally, but persist in nutrient‐poor conditions. Here, we investigate the importance of the larvae of fishes and corals and gametes of corals as nutrient subsidies for coral reefs. We provide evidence that fish larvae may be an ecologically important source of exogenous nutrients. We found that at the high end of mean estimates of fish larval supply rates, larvae can replace the nutrients in the entire fish community (estimated from Caribbean coral reefs) in 28 and 434 d for nitrogen (N) and phosphorus, respectively. Coral larvae, on the other hand, appear to represent only a fraction of the nutrients supplied by the larval fish community. In contrast, coral gametes provide substantial pulses of recycled nutrients during synchronous spawning events. Within a single night, gametes from coral spawning events can produce nutrient fluxes that represent 13 and 64 times the amount of N and carbon, respectively, stored in coral reef fish communities. Our analysis suggests that larvae and/or gametes of fishes and corals may represent an important, but previously underappreciated, source of nutrients to coral reefs that warrant inclusion into models of nutrient dynamics and ecosystem function.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.