Phosphorus leaching in a sandy soil as affected by organic and inorganic fertilizer sources

Kang, Jin-Ku; Amoozegar, Aziz; Hesterberg, Dean; Osmond, Deanna L.

doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.019

Cited by 154 publications

(89 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This shows that, especially for PL, using N contents for determining P rates might not be the best criterion. The reason is that, after successive manure applications, there was an accumulation of available P in the surface layers and migration in the soil profile, intensifying P transfer via surface runoff (Bertol et al, 2010;Ceretta et al, 2010b;Brennan et al, 2011;Kang et al, 2011) and leaching Girotto et al, 2013), which may cause eutrophication of surface and underground water bodies (Correll, 1998;Smith et al, 2007, Ceretta et al, 2010bHahn et al, 2012).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Available content, surface runoff and leaching of phosphorus forms in a typic hapludalf treated with organic and mineral nutrient sources

Lourenzi

Ceretta

Cerini

et al. 2014

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The application of animal manure to soil can increase phosphorus availability to plants and enhance transfer of the nutrient solution drained from the soil surface or leached into the soil profile. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of successive applications of organic and mineral nutrient sources on the available content, surface runoff and leaching of P forms in a Typic Hapludalf in no-tillage systems. Experiment 1 was set up in 2004 in the experimental area of UFSM, in Santa Maria (RS, Brazil). The treatments consisted of: control (without nutrient application) and application of pig slurry (PS), pig deep-litter (PL), cattle slurry (CS), and mineral fertilizers (NPK). The rates were determined to meet the N crop requirements of no-tillage black oat and maize, grown in the 2010/2011 growing season. The soil solution was collected after each event (rain + runoff or leaching) and the soluble, particulate and total P contents were measured. In November 2008, soil was collected in 2 cm intervals to a depth of 20 cm, in 5 cm intervals to a depth of 40 cm, and in 10 cm intervals to a depth of 70 cm. The soil was dried and ground, and P determined after extraction by anion exchange resin (AER). In experiment 2, samples collected from the Typic Hapludalf near experiment 1 were incubated for 20, 35, 58, 73 and 123 days after applying the following treatments: soil, soil + PS, soil + PL, soil + CS and soil + NPK. Thereafter, the soil was sampled and P was analyzed by AER. The applications of nutrient sources over the years led to an increase in available P and its migration in the soil profile. This led to P transfer via surface runoff and leaching, with the largest transfer being observed in PS and PL treatments, in which most P was applied. The soil available P and P transfer via surface runoff were correlated with the amounts applied, regardless of the P source. However, P transfer by leaching was not correlated with the applied nutrient amount, but rather with the solution amount leached in the soil profile.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Available content, surface runoff and leaching of phosphorus forms in a typic hapludalf treated with organic and mineral nutrient sources

Lourenzi

Ceretta

Cerini

et al. 2014

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4E,F), and since pig manure is a liquid fertilizer, application of this product might cause a higher risk of leaching in the field, especially on soils low in Fe and Al (cfr. Kang et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2012). Since also the efficiency in terms of P uptake and yield on sand was slightly higher (Table IV) and the soil pH significantly higher for the digestate treatment than for pig manure (Fig.…”

Section: Digestate and Animal Manurementioning

confidence: 92%

“…The rapid and increasing phosphorus (P) consumption in modern agriculture has raised concerns on both its supply security (Elser and Bennett, 2011;Godfray et al, 2010;Neset and Cordell, 2012;Scholz and Wellmer, 2013) and its impact on the environment (soil P accumulation, leaching, and/or eutrophication) (Kang et al, 2011;Ranatunga et al, 2013;Syers et al, 2008). Consequently, the effective use of soil P and P containing mineral and organic fertilizers, as well as the cradle-to-cradle recycling of P from municipal, agricultural, and other biodegradable waste sources as green renewable fertilizers with high P use efficiency (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Phosphorus Use Efficiency of Bio-Based Fertilizers: Bioavailability and Fractionation

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although to date some technologies producing bio-based phosphorus (P) fertilizers have been proposed and implemented, the efficient use of the recovered products is still limited due to legislative constraints, lack of insights in their P release with time, and in the corresponding mechanisms. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the fertilizer performance in terms of P release and use efficiency of recovered struvite, iron phosphate (FePO4) sludge, digestate, and animal manure as compared to fossil reserve-based mineral triple superphosphate (TSP). First, product physicochemical characteristics and P fractionations in the context of European fertilizer legislation were assessed. Next, a controlled greenhouse experiment was set up to evaluate plant reactions as well as changes in P availability on sandy soils with both high and low P status. P soil fractions were determined in extracts with water (Pw), ammonium lactate (PAl), CaCl2 (P-PAE), and in soil solution sampled with Rhizon soil moisture samplers (Prhizon). Based on all results, long-term field trials evaluating the P release effect of struvite and digestate as compared to animal manure and TSP on different soil types with varying P status appear to be worthwhile. These products show promise as sustainable substitutes for conventional P fertilizers and could contribute to a more efficient use of P in agriculture. A refined classification of P application standards/recommendations in terms of soil P status, texture, and fertilizer characteristics, next to the crop P demand, is recommended. Moreover, the additional use of Rhizon samplers for determination of direct available P, including dissolved organic P, is proposed for better understanding and categorization of different P fertilizers in environmental and fertilizer legislations.

show abstract

“…Surampalli et al (2008) found that nitrate-nitrogen contamination of the groundwater was occasionally observed probably due to an excess amendment of sludge. Kang et al (2011) and Alleoni et al (2008) pointed out that long-term application of sludge to soil as fertilizer can increase potential risk for phosphorus loss to ground and surface waters. Therefore, eutrophication of nitrogen and phosphorus loss from amendment of sludge to soil, especially in inclined site, should be taken to consideration of environmental risk.…”

Section: Organic Matter Plays Crucial Role In Availability Of Heavy Mmentioning

confidence: 99%

Achilles heel of environmental risk from recycling of sludge to soil as amendment: A summary in recent ten years (2007–2016)

Liu

2016

Waste Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tRecycling sludge as a soil amendment has both positive and negative effects because of its enrichment in both nutrients and contaminants. So far, the negative effect has to be extensively investigated that the severities of different types of contaminants also remain unclear. The environmental behavior and risk of organic contaminant and pharmaceuticals, heavy metal and salt as well as pathogenic microorganisms brought by sludge amendment are summarized and discussed here. Organic contaminants and pharmaceuticals are typically found at low concentrations in sludge, the risks from sludge-amended soil decrease over time owing to its biodegradability. On the other hand, application of sludge generally increases soil salinity, which may cause physiological damage to plants grown in sludge-amended soil. In some extent, this negative effect can be alleviated by means of dilution; however, greater attention should be paid to long term increasing possible risk of eutrophication. Heavy metal (particularly of mobile heavy metals, such as Cd) with high concentrations in sludge and soil receiving considerable sludge can cause its incremental abundance in soil and crop contamination, further posing risks to humans, but most cases showed that there remained not excessive in heavy metal caused by sludge amendment. It is worth noting that increasing soil organic matter content may reduce transfer of heavy metal from soil to crops, but not restrict its uptake by crops at all. Combined literature together, it is summarized that heavy metal becomes a relatively severe bottleneck in recycling of sludge as soil amendment due to its nonbiodegradability and potential damage to health by adventuring contamination from agricultural products. Particular attention should therefore be paid to long term monitoring the change of heavy metals concentration in sludge amended soil.

show abstract

Phosphorus leaching in a sandy soil as affected by organic and inorganic fertilizer sources

Cited by 154 publications

References 33 publications

Available content, surface runoff and leaching of phosphorus forms in a typic hapludalf treated with organic and mineral nutrient sources

Available content, surface runoff and leaching of phosphorus forms in a typic hapludalf treated with organic and mineral nutrient sources

Phosphorus Use Efficiency of Bio-Based Fertilizers: Bioavailability and Fractionation

Achilles heel of environmental risk from recycling of sludge to soil as amendment: A summary in recent ten years (2007–2016)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About