1960
DOI: 10.1021/jf60107a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorus Availability, Crop Response to Ammoniated Superphosphates and Dicalcium Phosphate, as Affected by Granule Size, Water Solubility, and Time of Reaction with Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the pot trials a very narrow range of pellet size was used, while in the field trials the pelletised Calciphos was used "as received"; and since it contained an appreciable amount of material minus 100 mesh B.S.S., this could be the main source of the response recorded. These results are in line with the conclusions of Terman et al (1960) and van Burg (1963) with regard to pelletising water-insoluble phosphates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the pot trials a very narrow range of pellet size was used, while in the field trials the pelletised Calciphos was used "as received"; and since it contained an appreciable amount of material minus 100 mesh B.S.S., this could be the main source of the response recorded. These results are in line with the conclusions of Terman et al (1960) and van Burg (1963) with regard to pelletising water-insoluble phosphates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Granulation or pelletising of this powder would be one solution. Previous work in granulating water-insoluble materials such as North Mrican phosphates, basic slag, etc., has been reported by Mattingly (1963), Terman et al (1960), and van Burg (1963) among many others. Invariably as particle size was increased crop response decreased in their trials.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Though the increased response relative to the 41 % for AMDL hard pellets reported in Trial B seems significant compared to superphosphate, it is still so poor that from commercial and agronomic viewpoints there appears to be little prospect in this line of research. DISCUSSION Calcium phosphates, by reaction with the iron and aluminium in acid mineral soils, change, more or less rapidly depending on their solubility, to less available phosphates of calcium, iron, and aluminium (Terman et al 1960) which resemble the amorphous calcium, iron, and aluminium phosphate in Calciphos. Pasture plants obtain a substantial portion of their phosphate requirements from these reaction products (Terman 1968), greater yields being obtained from pastures which have received repeated applications of phosphates (Cooke 1966).…”
Section: Trial Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phosphates were applied as fine powders ( -100 mesh) in amounts to supply 60 mg. of total phosphorus, P, per pot ( " Based on yields of oats (dry matter) as follows: 7.4 grams per pot with no P and limiting yield of 18.2 grams on Floyd sil, and 3.9 grams with no P and limiting yield of 26.5 grams on Ida sil. 6 Numbers refer to Table I. a Based on cumulative yields of dry matter by oats followed by sudangrass, millet sudangrass.…”
Section: Aosp + Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop response to water- soluble phosphorus (monoammonium phosphate) depended upon its content per granule, and response to waterinsoluble phosphorus (dicalcium phosphate) depended upon the surface area of the granules. Finely divided dicalcium phosphates have been shown in several experiments (6) to be much more available to various crops than their water solubility would indicate. Crop response to water-soluble vs. water-insoluble phosphorus in fertilizers is also influenced by the extent to which the phosphorus reacts with the soil (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%