1967
DOI: 10.1021/ja00998a012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance study of tertiary phosphine derivatives of Group VI metal carbonyls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
1
2

Year Published

1968
1968
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
53
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 31 P-NMR spectrum of W(CO) 5 (PCy 3 ), one observes a signal at 33.43 ppm, accompanied by the 183 W satellites (the 183 W Á/ 31 P coupling constant is 232 Hz, similar to the values observed for the W(CO) 5 (PR 3 ) complexes [19]). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In the 31 P-NMR spectrum of W(CO) 5 (PCy 3 ), one observes a signal at 33.43 ppm, accompanied by the 183 W satellites (the 183 W Á/ 31 P coupling constant is 232 Hz, similar to the values observed for the W(CO) 5 (PR 3 ) complexes [19]). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The pattern of CO stretching bands in the IR spectrum of complex 52 (2012, 1885, 1856 cm Ϫ1 ) is similar to that seen for 54 (2018, 1889, 1832 cm Ϫ1 ), but different from that in the case of complex 51 (2070, 1978, 1834 cm Ϫ1 ). This latter spectrum closely resembles that of Ph 3 PW(CO) 5 (2075, 1980, 1938 cm Ϫ1 ) [40] .…”
Section: Reactivity Of Pseudo-hypercoordinate Phosphanessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…methyl) would have the smallest angles in the uiiprotonated species and would change most on protonation, resulting in the largest chemical shift on protonation. This idea was presented earlier with respect to chemical shifts on coordination of tertiary phosphines with chromium carbonyl (9). This concept does explain the difference in the chemical shifts on protoilation between the series (constant R with a different number of phenyl groups) and within a series (constant number of phenyls with variable R).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%