2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phospholipid-stabilized microbubbles: Influence of shell chemistry on cavitation threshold and binding to giant uni-lamellar vesicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured stiffness could assist in both the theoretical modeling and experimental studies of the mechanical stresses induced on the blood vessel walls, allowing more precise understanding of the microbubble interactions with the capillaries. The slight change of the physicochemical properties of the microbubble shell was believed to cause a direct effect on the mechanical characteristics [41], [51]. The general assumption of no structural variation of the microbubble shells typically made in theoretical modeling [17], [34] may not hold for lipid microbubbles because our results indicated that microstructures on the monolayer surface could influence the overall microbubble elasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The measured stiffness could assist in both the theoretical modeling and experimental studies of the mechanical stresses induced on the blood vessel walls, allowing more precise understanding of the microbubble interactions with the capillaries. The slight change of the physicochemical properties of the microbubble shell was believed to cause a direct effect on the mechanical characteristics [41], [51]. The general assumption of no structural variation of the microbubble shells typically made in theoretical modeling [17], [34] may not hold for lipid microbubbles because our results indicated that microstructures on the monolayer surface could influence the overall microbubble elasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Early UCAs, now considered first-generation agents, comprised air plus a shell of albumin, lipid, or acrylate; second-generation agents replaced air with heavier, fluorinated compounds (e.g., octafluoropropane, perfluorobutane, or sulfur hexafluoride) that dissolve more slowly; and third-generation agents incorporated additional species (e.g., charged surfactants or PEGylated lipids) into the stabilizing shell to prevent bubble coalescence and convey stealth quality so as to prolong circulation time 3. It is now appreciated that a phospholipid monolayer coating provides reasonable longevity without sacrificing too greatly the acoustic response, and the fact that phospholipid composition and microstructure can influence microbubble material properties and resulting acoustic phenomena is widely recognized 4-9…”
Section: Inertial Cavitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key mechanism for this effect is believed to be inertial cavitation. Although controlled inertial cavitation can be used for therapeutics, the local increase in temperature and pressure of up to 5000 K [14] and 100 MPa [15], respectively, can damage nearby microstructures, including cells [16][17][18]. For this reason microbubble contrast agents have come under scrutiny since their development [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%