2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in spinal cord-injured men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(34 reference statements)
2
47
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The type of method used depends on the patient's comfort, preferences, and type of dysfunction. Studies have demonstrated PDE5 inhibitors to be safe in men with SCI (12,13). In this present study, 44.7% of the patients used PDE5 inhibitors and 17% used papaverine injections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The type of method used depends on the patient's comfort, preferences, and type of dysfunction. Studies have demonstrated PDE5 inhibitors to be safe in men with SCI (12,13). In this present study, 44.7% of the patients used PDE5 inhibitors and 17% used papaverine injections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…33 However, therapies for ED caused by SCI remain challenging, and PDE5 inhibitors, vacuum devices, penile implants, intraurethral prostaglandins, percutaneous perineal electrostimulation, transdermal nitroglycerin, intracavernous injection of papaverine and some other therapies are still under debate. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] The aim of this systematic review focused on comprehensively appraising efficacy and safety of PDE5 inhibitors in patients with SCI. In the present review, a large portion of ED patients secondary to SCI greatly benefited from PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, vardenafil or tadalafil).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the broad and fluid nature of these sexual terms, they may be interpreted very differently, by subjects and researchers alike, hence altering the meaning of the data collected. Many tools are commonly used in sexual assessment SCI studies today, including the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), 32,40,41 however, neither of these have been validated specifically for SCI. As with the reviewed outcome measures, the tools currently used also lack defined nomenclature to describe sexual aspects of functioning after SCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%