2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2013.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphine–phosphite ligands in the palladium-catalyzed asymmetric allylic alkylation: Electronic and steric effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several types of heterodonor P,P′-ligands were evaluated in Pd-catalyzed allylations, most of them heterodonor phosphine-containing ligands (e.g., phosphine-phosphoramidite, phosphine-diaminophosphine oxide and phosphine-phosphite), although phosphite-phosphoramidite ligands generally performed better in terms of enantioselectivitiy and substrate scope. Of the latter group, we highlight two families, ligands of type L53 derived from 1,2-amino alcohols and L54 with a furanoside backbone . All of them share the advantage of a modular structure and short syntheses from readily available starting materials and are also air stable.…”
Section: Asymmetric Allylic Substitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of heterodonor P,P′-ligands were evaluated in Pd-catalyzed allylations, most of them heterodonor phosphine-containing ligands (e.g., phosphine-phosphoramidite, phosphine-diaminophosphine oxide and phosphine-phosphite), although phosphite-phosphoramidite ligands generally performed better in terms of enantioselectivitiy and substrate scope. Of the latter group, we highlight two families, ligands of type L53 derived from 1,2-amino alcohols and L54 with a furanoside backbone . All of them share the advantage of a modular structure and short syntheses from readily available starting materials and are also air stable.…”
Section: Asymmetric Allylic Substitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For homogeneous (transition) metal catalysts it is more facile to obtain molecular-scale information of the active species, which in turn aids in unraveling the reaction mechanism of specific reactions (Cornils and Herrmann, 2002; Ferreira et al, 2004). It is now well-recognized that the use of electronically and/or sterically tuned ligands can lead to enhanced catalytic performance of the corresponding metal complexes (Trost et al, 1992; van Leeuwen, 2004; Praneeth et al, 2012; Farkas et al, 2013; Karroumi et al, 2015). Nonetheless, the rational design of tailor-made catalysts for specific transformations is still in its infancy, and systematic screening of catalysts is the main practice to “discover” new catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parameter generally increases as the σ‐donor strength of the corresponding P(III) fragment decreases 22. Thus, values for phosphine–selenides roughly lie in the range between 700 and 750 Hz, whereas for selenophosphates coupling constants between 1020 and 1060 Hz are typically observed 23,24. Notably, the cyclic nature of phosphite fragments present in P‐OP ligands also reduces the σ‐donor character of the corresponding phosphites because the values of their selenophosphates are about 30–40 Hz higher than those of acyclic phosphites 22a…”
Section: Features Of P‐op Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%