The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphate sorption by three potential filter materials as assessed by isothermal titration calorimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Steady state P removal observed in this study (Fig. 1a) was also observed in a sorption batch experiment where CFH was titrated with a 10 mM Pi solution (Lyngsie et al, 2014b) and by Chardon et al (2012) who conducted a Pi leaching column study with Fe-oxide coated sand mixed in different amounts. The steady state P removal observed for CFH and other Fe-oxides may be explained by the fast and strong sorption onto readily available (external) outer surface sites, which occur at a greater rate than the Pi migration into interior sorption sites.…”
Section: Phosphate Desorption By Filtralite1psupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Steady state P removal observed in this study (Fig. 1a) was also observed in a sorption batch experiment where CFH was titrated with a 10 mM Pi solution (Lyngsie et al, 2014b) and by Chardon et al (2012) who conducted a Pi leaching column study with Fe-oxide coated sand mixed in different amounts. The steady state P removal observed for CFH and other Fe-oxides may be explained by the fast and strong sorption onto readily available (external) outer surface sites, which occur at a greater rate than the Pi migration into interior sorption sites.…”
Section: Phosphate Desorption By Filtralite1psupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The pH further decreased during the 2 h desorption experiment by 0.6 units or less. Lyngsie et al (2014b) found that Pi retention by Filtralite J P is very pH dependent as also found by Herrmann et al (2013) and Karabelnik et al (2012). Thus, when pH decreased below 8.2, Filtralite 1 P nearly ceased to sorb Pi and even began to desorb indigenous Pi (Lyngsie et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Phosphate Desorption By Filtralite1pmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have highlighted and reviewed many different PSMs [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. In general, PSMs can be reduced to two main categories based on P sorption mechanism: iron (Fe)/aluminum (Al) based PSMs that remove P by ligand exchange reactions, and calcium (Ca)/magnesium (Mg) based PSMs that work by precipitating Ca and Mg phosphate minerals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result strongly suggests that the phosphorus removal in the columns occur by chemical adsorption or precipitation processes in the red ferralitic soil, forming strong Fe-P bonds. Lyngsie et al (2014) also obtained the formation of strong Fe-P bonds with Fe oxide-based CFH-12 substrate. Table 8 show the phosphorus extracted in each fraction.…”
Section: Sequential Extractionmentioning
confidence: 90%