The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphate removal from water by fly ash: Factorial experimental design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(39 reference statements)
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Phosphorus adsorption capacity of slagCSH after 24 h of adsorption was determined to be 53.11 P-mg/g, which was 73 times greater than that of BF slag. This phosphorus adsorption capacity is markedly higher than those previously reported on solid adsorbents derived from minerals and industrial wastes, [9][10][11][12][13][14] demonstrating its excellent adsorption ability toward phosphate ions in water. PureCSH as a reference sample exhibited a higher phosphorus adsorption capacity (86.23 P-mg/g) than slagCSH irrespective of its subpar structural properties (S BET = 154 m 2 /g, V total = 0.62 cm 3 /g).…”
Section: Adsorption Of Phosphatecontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Phosphorus adsorption capacity of slagCSH after 24 h of adsorption was determined to be 53.11 P-mg/g, which was 73 times greater than that of BF slag. This phosphorus adsorption capacity is markedly higher than those previously reported on solid adsorbents derived from minerals and industrial wastes, [9][10][11][12][13][14] demonstrating its excellent adsorption ability toward phosphate ions in water. PureCSH as a reference sample exhibited a higher phosphorus adsorption capacity (86.23 P-mg/g) than slagCSH irrespective of its subpar structural properties (S BET = 154 m 2 /g, V total = 0.62 cm 3 /g).…”
Section: Adsorption Of Phosphatecontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Previous results have shown that substrate adsorption plays the most important role in P immobilization [4][5][6][7][8]. Therefore, cheap and effective P adsorbents are highly desirable [9][10][11].The most commonly used substrates in CWs are quartz sands [12], activated carbon (AC) [12][13], zeolite [14], ceramic [15], and furnace slag [16][17], and prior research has shown that the removal of P by these substrates mainly occurs though physical adsorption, chemical precipitation, and ion exchange [10][11]. However, P sorption properties of the substrates have not been systematically estimated, which resulted in many defective packing layer designs for CWs [3,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the second degree polynomial equation is analyzed (Equation 5), it is known that the parameter with a greater coefficient has a greater effect on the biosorption. A positive sign shows that parameters and dependent variables are directly related (Can and Yildiz 2006). Thus, it was observed that, when the value of a factor is increased from a lower level to a higher level, metal retaining effect increased as well.…”
Section: Effect Of Primary Parameters On Biosorptionmentioning
confidence: 96%