2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phosphate removal by refined aspen wood fiber treated with carboxymethyl cellulose and ferrous chloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
47
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A reasonable explanation for these results from the P adsorption isotherm is that the surface of the untreated biochar is often negatively charged, whereas the treatment with ZnCl 2 (activated biochar with ZnCl 2 ) produces more positive sites on the surface of the biochar. Eberhardt et al (2006) and Yao et al (2011a) also obtained similar results. They indicated that the surface of the biochar is often negatively charged, causing it to repel negatively charged ions such as Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Activation Methods For Biochar On Phosphorus Adsorpsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A reasonable explanation for these results from the P adsorption isotherm is that the surface of the untreated biochar is often negatively charged, whereas the treatment with ZnCl 2 (activated biochar with ZnCl 2 ) produces more positive sites on the surface of the biochar. Eberhardt et al (2006) and Yao et al (2011a) also obtained similar results. They indicated that the surface of the biochar is often negatively charged, causing it to repel negatively charged ions such as Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Activation Methods For Biochar On Phosphorus Adsorpsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In adsorption processes, diverse adsorbents such as red mud, activated alumina, polymeric ligand exchangers, iron/aluminum-coated sand, calcium-based adsorbents, sugarcane bagasse, sawdust, etc. have been studied as adsorbents for phosphate removal (Ayoub et al 2001;Karthikeyan et al 2002;Del Bubba et al 2003;Eberhardt et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum adsorption capacities of PSB were 3.67, 5.50, and 6.79 mg g -1 at 10, 20, and 30°C, respectively. Furthermore, PSB has a quite high adsorption capability for phosphate compared to reported other biomaterials, e.g., 4.8 mg g -1 for okara (Nguyen et al 2013), 4.3 mg g -1 for aspen wood fiber (Eberhardt et al 2006), 2.3 mg g -1 for juniper fiber (Han et al 2005), and 4.4 mg g -1 for palm fiber (Riahi et al 2009). The adsorption capacities for PSB increased with an increasing temperature, suggesting that the system is an endothermic and chemical process.…”
Section: Adsorption Equilibrium Of Phosphate On Psbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, phosphate was not detected in the samples with oak wood and peanut shells. Normally, the surfaces of charcoals are negatively charged, which makes them unlikely to sorb negatively charged ions such as phosphate (Lee et al 2010;Eberhardt et al 2006). The measured zeta potentials of the various biochars were negative, as shown in Table 3, confirming that the biochars employed here were negatively charged under circumneutral conditions.…”
Section: Textural Properties Of Biochar Derived From Various Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%