2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0305000904006233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonotactic probabilities in young children's speech production

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThis research explores the role of phonotactic probability in two-yearolds' production of coda consonants. Twenty-nine children were asked to repeat CVC non-words that were used as labels for pictures of imaginary animals. The CVC non-words were controlled for their phonotactic probabilities, neighbourhood densities, word-likelihood ratings, and contained the identical coda across low and high phonotactic probability pairs. This allowed for comparisons of children's productions of the same coda … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
113
3
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
113
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that the frequency of inflected plurals in the input that children hear is a good predictor of their likelihood of producing plural -s (Zapf, 2004). Further attesting to the role of input statistics, several studies have shown that typically developing children (Edwards & Beckman, 2008;Edwards, Beckman, & Munson, 2004;Munson, 2001;Storkel, 2001;Zamuner, Gerken, & Hammond, 2004) as well as those with SLI (Munson, Edwards, & Beckman, 2005;Munson, Kurtz, and Windsor, 2005) repeat novel words with high-probability phoneme sequences more accurately than they repeat those with low-probability sequences. In addition, many of these studies indicate that children with smaller vocabularies are more likely to be affected by input statistics than children with larger vocabularies.…”
Section: A Phonological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that the frequency of inflected plurals in the input that children hear is a good predictor of their likelihood of producing plural -s (Zapf, 2004). Further attesting to the role of input statistics, several studies have shown that typically developing children (Edwards & Beckman, 2008;Edwards, Beckman, & Munson, 2004;Munson, 2001;Storkel, 2001;Zamuner, Gerken, & Hammond, 2004) as well as those with SLI (Munson, Edwards, & Beckman, 2005;Munson, Kurtz, and Windsor, 2005) repeat novel words with high-probability phoneme sequences more accurately than they repeat those with low-probability sequences. In addition, many of these studies indicate that children with smaller vocabularies are more likely to be affected by input statistics than children with larger vocabularies.…”
Section: A Phonological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may well be that these factors, along with increased utterance length, all contributed to the lower plural production rates in utterance-medial position. Indeed, research has shown that the relative frequency with which a coda consonant occurs in the lexicon is related to the degree that it is produced in children's speech (Zamuner, Gerken, & Hammond, 2004). Future research will be needed to independently determine the possible effects of these lexical, prosodic, and utterance-length factors on morpheme production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, phonotactic probabilities influence children's ability to encode and maintain a new phonological sequence in memory. In a nonword repetition task, they are more accurate when repeating high-than low-phonotactic frequency nonwords (Coady & Aslin, 2004;Edwards, Beckman, & Munson, 2004;Zamuner, Gerken, & Hammond, 2004). And third, phonotactic probabilities have been shown to be involved in spoken word recognition in toddlers.…”
Section: The Importance Of Sensitivity To Phonotactics In Language Dementioning
confidence: 99%