2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5083104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonon modes and photonic excitation transitions of MoS2 induced by top-deposited graphene revealed by Raman spectroscopy and photoluminescence

Abstract: Although the MoS2/graphene 2D stack achieved a lot of attention in recent research on 2D semiconductor devices, the interface interaction between perfect MoS2 and graphene and its effects on the electronic properties are rarely studied. Here, we report our recent studies on Raman spectroscopy and photoluminescence of the MoS2/graphene heterostructure. A nearly perfect interface between these two materials was achieved with a dry transfer and forming gas annealing. Raman spectroscopy of the heterostructure show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[58] The Δ values of 18.4, 21.6, 23.4, and 25.5 cm À1 are characterized for monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and bulk MoS 2 , respectively. [59] Here, the Raman data of N-doped MoS 2 and undoped MoS 2 attest to the evidence of trilayer and bilayer NSs according to Δ ¼ 23.4 cm À1 and Δ ¼ 21.1 cm À1 , respectively, in agreement with previous articles. [19,59,60] The discrepancy in the Raman mode frequencies attributes to the local thickness variations.…”
Section: Ramansupporting
confidence: 92%
“…[58] The Δ values of 18.4, 21.6, 23.4, and 25.5 cm À1 are characterized for monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and bulk MoS 2 , respectively. [59] Here, the Raman data of N-doped MoS 2 and undoped MoS 2 attest to the evidence of trilayer and bilayer NSs according to Δ ¼ 23.4 cm À1 and Δ ¼ 21.1 cm À1 , respectively, in agreement with previous articles. [19,59,60] The discrepancy in the Raman mode frequencies attributes to the local thickness variations.…”
Section: Ramansupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The relative intensity of the two predicted phonon sidebands favoring the lower one agrees well with the experimental observation. An indirect dark exciton has also been observed in MoS 2 -MoS 2 [23,49] and WSe 2 -WSe 2 [26,49] located about 300 meV and 200 meV below the bright exciton, respectively -in a very good agreement with our results summarized in Table I. Similar observations have been made also for WS 2 -WS 2 including a peak roughly 200 meV below the K-K exciton [25].…”
Section: B Photoluminescencesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1. Previous studies on interlayer excitons have been conducted, focusing mostly on their optical signatures [22][23][24][25][26]. However, the crucial question about the spectral position and ordering of bright and dark exciton states is still debated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency difference between the two modes is ∼24 cm −1 , indicating that it is a trilayer MoS 2 . 29,30 Figure 2c is the TEM image and the detailed EDS elemental map of the source region of the device where Gr is located above the MoS 2 channel, and the Gr/MoS 2 heterostructure is sandwiched between the top hBN encapsulating layer and the bottom hBN gate dielectric. As shown in the TEM image, the top and bottom hBN have a similar thickness of around 5 nm, and MoS 2 and Gr are trilayer and monolayer, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the intensity ratio of 2D to G peak is ∼2.46 and the 2D band shows a single Lorentzian curve with a full width at half-maximum of ∼28.27 cm –1 , which indicates that it is a monolayer Gr. , The MoS 2 exhibits the E 2g 1 peak at ∼383.1 cm –1 and A 1g peak at ∼407.1 cm –1 . The frequency difference between the two modes is ∼24 cm –1 , indicating that it is a trilayer MoS 2 . , Figure c is the TEM image and the detailed EDS elemental map of the source region of the device where Gr is located above the MoS 2 channel, and the Gr/MoS 2 heterostructure is sandwiched between the top hBN encapsulating layer and the bottom hBN gate dielectric. As shown in the TEM image, the top and bottom hBN have a similar thickness of around 5 nm, and MoS 2 and Gr are trilayer and monolayer, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%