2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonon instability and ideal strength of silicene under tension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
29
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The bond length monotonically increases with increasing strain, but the bond length non-monotonically increases in the zigzag direction stretch. This result is in agreement with density functional theory calculations by Yang et al [6]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bond length monotonically increases with increasing strain, but the bond length non-monotonically increases in the zigzag direction stretch. This result is in agreement with density functional theory calculations by Yang et al [6]. …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Yang et al [6] found the ideal strengths for uniaxial tension and armchair uniaxial tension based on ab initio calculation. Zhang et al [7] studied novel finite metal endohedral silicene-like silicon nanotubes with the density functional theory and found that their structural stability increase with an increasing tube length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, an in-plane uniaxial strain (e.g., ϵ xx ), while changing the symmetry, leads to the same energy change for both bands making up the Dirac point since they both have the same deformation potential e 1 ; thus, the only effect is a shift in energies. Our analysis provides a formal resolution to the controversy from DFT calculations about whether a gap is opened by a uniaxial strain or not [20][21][22][23]. Zhao and Mohan et al both predicted a gap opening [20,21].…”
Section: Strainmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Zhao and Mohan et al both predicted a gap opening [20,21]. However, Qin et al [24] and Yang et al [23] did not obtain a gap and only obtained a shift of the Dirac point. The latter interpreted the disagreement of Zhao to their using insufficient k points near the crossing.…”
Section: Strainmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, it was reported that the buckling height of borophene reduces to zero when the biaxial tensile strain reaches ε ab = 0.13 8 . Similarly, the buckling height of silicene drops to zero when a uniaxial strain along the zigzag direction reaches 0.17 51 . However, the buckling height of fully hydrogenated silicene remains at 0.63 Å at the same strain 52 .…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%