2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonon-Driven Energy Relaxation in PbS/CdS and PbSe/CdSe Core/Shell Quantum Dots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(144 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All these PbSe QDs and corresponding core/shell QDs show Stokes shifts of ca. 30–40 nm, which are similar to the literature reports. ,, The observed red shift during shell growth may be explained by the quasi-type II band alignment of PbSe/CdS QDs. , With the increase of the CdS shell, the delocalization of either electron or hole wave function into a shell layer induced the red shift. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…All these PbSe QDs and corresponding core/shell QDs show Stokes shifts of ca. 30–40 nm, which are similar to the literature reports. ,, The observed red shift during shell growth may be explained by the quasi-type II band alignment of PbSe/CdS QDs. , With the increase of the CdS shell, the delocalization of either electron or hole wave function into a shell layer induced the red shift. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Nonadiabatic dynamics (NAD) is a powerful tool for predicting the coupled evolution of electrons and nuclei. It can be used to detail excited state processes in chemical systems, such as hot carrier cooling, electron–hole recombination, and carrier–carrier and carrier–phonon scattering . Multiple trajectory surface hopping (TSH) approaches are available nowadays for modeling NAD, with methods like Tully’s fewest switches surface hopping (FSSH) algorithm being among the most adopted ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the simplicity of the TSH approaches, their application to modeling NAD in nanoscale systems and periodic solids is still prohibitively expensive. To enable such simulations, two key approximations are widely used: (a) the Neglect-of-Back-Reaction Approximation (NBRA) of Craig, Duncan, and Prezhdo, which neglects the response of nuclear evolution to the change of electronic states upon photoexcitation or excited state decay; (b) the single-particle (SP) approximation in modeling electronic excited states, where the state energies and nonadiabatic couplings (NACs) are computed using the properties of 1-electron molecular orbitals (MOs) such as Kohn–Sham (KS) orbitals, ,, semiempirical or ab initio MOs, , and individual excited Slater determinants (SDs) built out of these types of SP orbitals. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the level of theory used and the size of the systems studied, such calculations may be quite expensive. Conventionally, few-picosecond trajectories are computed for systems of few hundreds of atoms while using Kohn–Sham (KS) orbitals and pure functionals such as the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE). ,, Recently, we have extended this procedure to go beyond the KS picture via the time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations of excited states and computing the corresponding couplings. , However, one major drawback of such an approach is that the TD-DFT still relies on the short-ranged exchange component of the PBE functional and hence is incapable of fully capturing excitonic effects. To capture such effects, the TD-DFT calculations with hybrid functionals are desirable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%