2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonological Representations in Prelexical Speech Processing: Evidence from Form-Based Priming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
107
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
11
107
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is more difficult to recognize high-density words than low-density words (e.g., Luce and Pisoni 1998;Vitevitch and Luce 1998), likely due to simultaneous activation of multiple similar-sounding neighbors. Consistent with the Neighborhood Activation Model (Luce and Pisoni 1998), increased competition from multiple phonological neighbors may result in low activation of high-density words (also see Slowiaczek et al 2000). Therefore, during bilingual processing, cross-linguistic competitors with high-density neighborhoods may be less likely to become co-activated than cross-linguistic competitors with low-density neighborhoods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is more difficult to recognize high-density words than low-density words (e.g., Luce and Pisoni 1998;Vitevitch and Luce 1998), likely due to simultaneous activation of multiple similar-sounding neighbors. Consistent with the Neighborhood Activation Model (Luce and Pisoni 1998), increased competition from multiple phonological neighbors may result in low activation of high-density words (also see Slowiaczek et al 2000). Therefore, during bilingual processing, cross-linguistic competitors with high-density neighborhoods may be less likely to become co-activated than cross-linguistic competitors with low-density neighborhoods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…At the lexical stage, phonological similarity has been shown to result in competition (and inhibition) between items during auditory word recognition (e.g., Slowiaczek et al 2000). For example, during a shadowing task (where participants repeat words they hear), inhibition was found for targets that were preceded by high-overlap primes (e.g., blastblack), but not for non-words, suggesting that competition between similar-sounding words was localized to the lexical level (e.g., Slowiaczek and Hamburger 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the inhibitory priming effects are restricted to words overlapping at their onsets (Monsell & Hirsh, 1998;Radeau et al, 1995). When the same kind of overlap occurs at offset, facilitation tends to be found (Dumay, Benraïss, Barriol, Colin, Radeau, & Besson, 2001;Monsell & Hirsh, 1998;Radeau et al, 1995;Slowiaczek, McQueen, Soltano, & Lynch, 2000), although the effect in the lexical decision task appears to be modulated by strategic bias (Norris, McQueen, & Cutler, 2002).…”
Section: Competition Effects In Phonological Primingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Targets that rhyme with their primes are recognized more quickly than non-rhyming targets (e.g., Donnenwerth-Nolan et al, 1981;Emmorey, 1989;Monsell and Hirsh, 1998;Praamstra et al, 1994;Radeau et al, 1998;Shulman et al, 1978;Slowiaczek et al, 2000). This effect has been found in many studies and across many paradigms, but not in cross modal paradigms (Cutler et al, 1999;Radeau et al, 1995).…”
Section: Behavioral Studies Of Spoken Word Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 95%