2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonological processing in relation to reading: An fMRI study in deaf readers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
59
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
8
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whole brain correlations with post-CI scores showed a dorsoventral dissociation, depending on the duration of hearing loss. The dorsal network, where activity decreased with deafness duration, largely overlapped with a network described as the phonological route of reading (Aparicio, Gounot, Demont, & Metz-Lutz, 2007;Ziegler et al, 2008) used by deaf subjects to perform phonological tasks, e.g. rhyming tasks, and that we previously found to positively correlate with post-CI scores (Lazard et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Whole brain correlations with post-CI scores showed a dorsoventral dissociation, depending on the duration of hearing loss. The dorsal network, where activity decreased with deafness duration, largely overlapped with a network described as the phonological route of reading (Aparicio, Gounot, Demont, & Metz-Lutz, 2007;Ziegler et al, 2008) used by deaf subjects to perform phonological tasks, e.g. rhyming tasks, and that we previously found to positively correlate with post-CI scores (Lazard et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The majority of studies that investigate the role of phonology in the deaf population do so through meta-phonological tasks and phonological awareness, which require explicit phonological judgments (Aparicio, Gounot, Demont, & Metz-Lutz, 2007;Campbell & Wright, 1988;Dyer, MacSweeney, Szczerbinski, Green, & Campbell, 2003;Transler, Leybaert, & Gombert, 1999;Waters & Doehring, 1990). In addition, many of these studies focus on deaf children, where reading is still in the development phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors suggested that oral language rhyme sensitivity, presumably developed via speechreading and articulatory information in the deaf participants, is supported by the same neural systems in both deaf and hearing individuals. Results from fMRI studies using pictures (MacSweeney, Brammer, Waters, & Goswami, 2009) or written words (Aparicio, Gounot, Demont, & Metz-Lutz, 2007) as stimuli also suggest that similar neuronal networks are engaged in rhyme judgment processing in deaf as in normally hearing individuals. Deaf participants however show larger activations in the left IFG, suggesting enhanced use of articulatory recoding and spelling-to-sound conversion strategies (Aparicio et al, 2007;MacSweeney et al, 2009).…”
Section: Rhyme Judgment and Explicit Processingmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Results from fMRI studies using pictures (MacSweeney, Brammer, Waters, & Goswami, 2009) or written words (Aparicio, Gounot, Demont, & Metz-Lutz, 2007) as stimuli also suggest that similar neuronal networks are engaged in rhyme judgment processing in deaf as in normally hearing individuals. Deaf participants however show larger activations in the left IFG, suggesting enhanced use of articulatory recoding and spelling-to-sound conversion strategies (Aparicio et al, 2007;MacSweeney et al, 2009). The present results show that the R-O+ condition may be important to include when examining rhyme judgments in individuals with HI.…”
Section: Rhyme Judgment and Explicit Processingmentioning
confidence: 89%