“…These mechanisms are bi-hemispherically distributed and left hemisphere specialization may be in part directed by connectivity changes under linguistic tasks (Leaver and Rauschecker, 2010, Markiewicz and Bohland, 2016, Obleser et al., 2010, Zhang et al., 2016). This interpretation also accords with the differential activation profiles shown by the present patient groups on the relevant phonemic contrast: compared with healthy controls, the nfvPPA and svPPA groups showed relatively normal activation profiles, whereas the lvPPA group exhibited a significantly attenuated response to natural phonemes in the key superior temporal region, in line with the clinical deficits of phonological processing (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2008, Grube et al., 2016, Hailstone et al., 2012, Hardy et al., 2015, Henry et al., 2016, Rohrer et al., 2010) and related deficits of paralinguistic analysis (Rohrer et al., 2012) previously documented in lvPPA. Although we did not assess working memory directly in this experiment, posterior superior temporal cortex has been shown to play an integral role in auditory working memory for phonemes as well as other auditory objects (Kumar et al., 2016, Markiewicz and Bohland, 2016), suggesting that the profile identified here is relevant to the phonological working memory impairment that is a defining feature of lvPPA (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2008, Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011).…”