2001
DOI: 10.1121/1.4777515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phonological neighborhoods and phonetic similarity in spoken word recognition

Abstract: English neighborhood literature has demonstrated that neighborhood density affects the auditory word recognition. However, an unresolved question is exactly how neighborhood density should be calculated. In this paper the definition of a lexical neighborhood is explored in Japanese. Data for the analyses were collected from Japanese neighborhood experiments using the same 700 test words and a lexicon that consisted of only nouns from the NTT psycholinguistic database [Amano and Konodo, 1999]. Three different n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in Korean, the PI for null codas (in syllables without codas) was lower than the PI for the other possible codas, suggesting that a syllable without coda is fairly common in Japanese. This observation is compatible with the finding on the prevalence of CV syllables in Yoneyama (2000). …”
Section: Informativitysupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As in Korean, the PI for null codas (in syllables without codas) was lower than the PI for the other possible codas, suggesting that a syllable without coda is fairly common in Japanese. This observation is compatible with the finding on the prevalence of CV syllables in Yoneyama (2000). …”
Section: Informativitysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…That /k/ has a lower PI than null onset suggests that onset /k/ is more common than syllables without onsets. The pattern is consistent with the finding in Japanese by Yoneyama (2000), in which /k/ was the most frequent sound.…”
Section: Informativitysupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations