Phonological Conditioning of Word Formation Rules

Szymanek, Bogdan

doi:10.1515/flin.1980.14.3-4.413

Folia Linguistica

1980

DOI: 10.1515/flin.1980.14.3-4.413

|View full text |Cite

Phonological Conditioning of Word Formation Rules

Bogdan Szymanek¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1987

2016

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is the whole area of conditions on rules and rule interaction within morphology, of blocking, of the semantics of derivatives, of the morpheme vs word-based models, etc. (see Beard, 1981;Gorska, 1982;Malicka-Kleparska, 1985Szymanek, 1980Szymanek, , 1985van Marie, 1985). Mohanan in one breath (45) speaks about the prefix dis-attached at stratum 1 to produce words like dispense, dispute, disperse and at stratum 2 to produce displace, dispassionate, disprove, etc.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

K. P. Mohanan, The theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986. Pp. xii + 219.

Gussmann¹

1988

J. Ling.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

K. P. Mohanan, The theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986. Pp. xii + 219.

Gussmann¹

1988

J. Ling.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Revival of Romance Roots

Baeskow

2006

Morphology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bound roots such as duce, scribe, ceive etc. are usually considered to be relics of Latin or French which in English do not provide lexical information unless they are combined with a prefix (e.g. reduce, describe, perceive). In this morphemebased study it will be argued that these roots and their 'marked' variants duct, script, cept etc., the latter being past participles from an etymological point of view, have retained a life of their own in some respects and thus require individual lexical entries. These entries specify not only orthographic and phonological information, but also morpho-syntactic and skeletal semantic features. The central argument of this study is that the lexical properties identified here for bound roots of Latin origin are synchronically recognizable and thus relevant for all speakers of English, whether they have access to etymological knowledge or not. Evidence for this hypothesis will be drawn from empirical considerations and language-internal phenomena.1 At this point, a brief remark as to the term 'root' is necessary. From a morphological point of view, Marantz' application of this term is quite abstract because it is obviously intended to refer not only to monomorphemic words like grow, but also to complex words like destroy, which are composed of a root and further morphological material. In this paper, the term 'root' is used in the sense of Bauer (1983: 20), i.e. as ''that part of a word-form that remains when all inflectional and derivational affixes have been removed.'' Roots like duce, ceive, scribe etc. will be referred to here as 'bound roots' because they cannot occur independently of other morphemes in sentences. The term 'stem' should be reserved for inflectional morphology. 2 An alternative to subcategorization frames is offered by Plag (2004). Based on the results of an extensive corpus analysis, which revealed that most English affixes are compatible with bases of more than one syntactic category, he argues that the word-class of the input is of subordinate importance in English derivational morphology and that base selection is mainly governed by semantic considerations. Morphology (2006) 16:3-36 5 3 The effectiveness of feature-based linguistic analyses is stressed e

show abstract

Melody-free syntax and phonologically conditioned allomorphy

Scheer

2016

Morphology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Phonological Conditioning of Word Formation Rules

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

K. P. Mohanan, The theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986. Pp. xii + 219.

K. P. Mohanan, The theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986. Pp. xii + 219.

A Revival of Romance Roots

Melody-free syntax and phonologically conditioned allomorphy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About