2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2015.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phone classification via manifold learning based dimensionality reduction algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are quite a number of studies on vowel classification in the literature. Most of them are based on frequency domain analysis using features such as formant frequencies [2,3], linear predictive coding coefficients (LPCC), perceptual linear prediction (PLP) coefficients [4], mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) [5,6,7,8], wavelets [9], spectro-temporal features [10], and spectral decomposition [11]. However, there are fewer studies using time domain analysis [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are quite a number of studies on vowel classification in the literature. Most of them are based on frequency domain analysis using features such as formant frequencies [2,3], linear predictive coding coefficients (LPCC), perceptual linear prediction (PLP) coefficients [4], mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) [5,6,7,8], wavelets [9], spectro-temporal features [10], and spectral decomposition [11]. However, there are fewer studies using time domain analysis [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computations used in the demonstration are reviewed in Appendix A (hence, readers unfamiliar with graph-based methods may want to read material therein before proceeding with Section 2). In general, graph-based manifold methods have been usefully applied across a range of speech science modeling problems including phonetic category learning (e.g., Jansen & Niyogi, 2007; Plummer et al, 2010; Plummer, 2014) and automatic speech recognition (e.g., Errity & McKenna, 2006; Jafari & Almasganj, 2010; Zhao & Zhang, 2012; Norouzian et al, 2013; Tomar & Rose, 2014; Huang et al, 2016b,a). Section 3 discusses broader motivation for the manifold assumption as well as how our framework is situated with respect to recent advances in representation learning within the machine learning community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%