2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2014.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phobos: Observed bulk properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, such gravity field models are available for only a limited number of solar system bodies. For Phobos, results from radio science data reduction merely show signals for low degree terms of its gravity field due to the short-arc data from flyby and an unfavorable observation geometry (Andert et al, 2011;Pätzold et al, 2014). Therefore, it is appropriate and practical to develop working models for the gravity field of Phobos using shape-based forward modeling method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, such gravity field models are available for only a limited number of solar system bodies. For Phobos, results from radio science data reduction merely show signals for low degree terms of its gravity field due to the short-arc data from flyby and an unfavorable observation geometry (Andert et al, 2011;Pätzold et al, 2014). Therefore, it is appropriate and practical to develop working models for the gravity field of Phobos using shape-based forward modeling method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, some of our calculations above, which utilise perfect merging upon collision, are probably naive. On the other hand, the low densities of Phobos and Deimos (Andert et al 2010;Pätzold et al 2014) are often used as arguments to suggest that they are rubble piles, likely substantially fractured during prior evolutionary stages. This is eminently consistent with the energetics of the above scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge of the gravity field when combined with other bulk parameters, such as shape, volume, bulk density, porosity, and water ice content are key information for models of internal mass distribution, structure, composition, and Deimos/Phobos origins. Using data from X-band radio tracking during recent spacecraft flybys, especially by Mars Express (Andert et al, 2010;Pätzold et al, 2014b;Rosenblatt et al, 2008), the mass of Phobos has been estimated as 1.065 ± 0.016 10 16 kg (Pätzold et al, 2014a). The higher degree and order terms of the gravity fields (e.g., the C 20 and the C 22 terms) of Phobos suffer from large uncertainties (Pätzold et al, 2014b), due to the faint gravity signatures, the high spacecraft flyby speeds and the large flyby distances.…”
Section: Mass and Gravity Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of ice repositories would provide a strong constraint on the moons origins. However, neither the proportions of rock and water nor the origin of Deimos and Phobos can be constrained by the bulk density alone (Pätzold et al, 2014a;Rosenblatt, 2011).…”
Section: Interior Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation