2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phobos mass determination from the very close flyby of Mars Express in 2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The knowledge of the gravity field when combined with other bulk parameters, such as shape, volume, bulk density, porosity, and water ice content are key information for models of internal mass distribution, structure, composition, and Deimos/Phobos origins. Using data from X-band radio tracking during recent spacecraft flybys, especially by Mars Express (Andert et al, 2010;Pätzold et al, 2014b;Rosenblatt et al, 2008), the mass of Phobos has been estimated as 1.065 ± 0.016 10 16 kg (Pätzold et al, 2014a). The higher degree and order terms of the gravity fields (e.g., the C 20 and the C 22 terms) of Phobos suffer from large uncertainties (Pätzold et al, 2014b), due to the faint gravity signatures, the high spacecraft flyby speeds and the large flyby distances.…”
Section: Mass and Gravity Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The knowledge of the gravity field when combined with other bulk parameters, such as shape, volume, bulk density, porosity, and water ice content are key information for models of internal mass distribution, structure, composition, and Deimos/Phobos origins. Using data from X-band radio tracking during recent spacecraft flybys, especially by Mars Express (Andert et al, 2010;Pätzold et al, 2014b;Rosenblatt et al, 2008), the mass of Phobos has been estimated as 1.065 ± 0.016 10 16 kg (Pätzold et al, 2014a). The higher degree and order terms of the gravity fields (e.g., the C 20 and the C 22 terms) of Phobos suffer from large uncertainties (Pätzold et al, 2014b), due to the faint gravity signatures, the high spacecraft flyby speeds and the large flyby distances.…”
Section: Mass and Gravity Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using data from X-band radio tracking during recent spacecraft flybys, especially by Mars Express (Andert et al, 2010;Pätzold et al, 2014b;Rosenblatt et al, 2008), the mass of Phobos has been estimated as 1.065 ± 0.016 10 16 kg (Pätzold et al, 2014a). The higher degree and order terms of the gravity fields (e.g., the C 20 and the C 22 terms) of Phobos suffer from large uncertainties (Pätzold et al, 2014b), due to the faint gravity signatures, the high spacecraft flyby speeds and the large flyby distances. Besides, even though the Phobos ephemeris has improved over the years (Lainey et al, 2007;Jacobson, 2010;Lainey et al, 2016), the Phobos positions relative to the spacecraft during the flybys were poorly known.…”
Section: Mass and Gravity Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a 100 m resolution Digital Terrain Model [ Willner et al , ], which was computed using HRSC image data from 20 flybys applying photogrammetric stereo techniques. The latest bulk density value of 1.862 g cm −3 [ Pätzold et al , ; Willner et al , ] was used. The other two contributions to surface acceleration are connected to the orbital evolution of Phobos.…”
Section: Orbital Evolution and Changes In Dynamical Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the satellite is currently moving in a near‐circular orbit at a distance of only 2.76 Mars radii from Mars center, it is expected to disrupt within timescales of 20–50 Ma [ Burns , ; Bills et al , ; Black and Mittal , ]. With its small dimension of 13.03 × 11.4 × 9.14 km [ Willner et al , ] and low bulk density of 1.862 g cm −3 [ Pätzold et al , ], the self‐gravitation of Phobos is relatively weak. In contrast, its extreme proximity to Mars near the Roche limit and its fast synchronous rotation are associated with considerable tidal and centrifugal forces [ Dobrovolskis and Burns , ; Bills et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar estimate was made for a disk clump in T Cha, for which Schisano et al (2009) report a clump mass M cl ≈ 4 × 10 20 g. However, their calculation was based on optical extinction (A V ) and an assumed N H to A V relationship. For comparison, the mass of the Martian moon Phobos is 1.06 × 10 19 g (Pätzold et al 2014).…”
Section: Relationship Between Atomic and Optical Extinctionmentioning
confidence: 99%