1992
DOI: 10.3109/02841859209173121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phlebography as the Gold Standard in Thromboprophylactic Studies?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a bilateral venography is necessary for complete information. The evaluation of venograms proves to be a factor of uncertainty since the agreements on positive diagnosis among different investigators can vary between 65% and 83% [16]. New non-invasive and accurate methods have been developed over the past two decades [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a bilateral venography is necessary for complete information. The evaluation of venograms proves to be a factor of uncertainty since the agreements on positive diagnosis among different investigators can vary between 65% and 83% [16]. New non-invasive and accurate methods have been developed over the past two decades [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…71 These factors can also lead to significant discrepancies in diagnosis, even among experienced radiologists. 71 These factors can also lead to significant discrepancies in diagnosis, even among experienced radiologists.…”
Section: Limitations and Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no absolute method to confirm the accuracy of venography and therefore kappa analysis of interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility is used. The diagnosis of venographic DVT is only modestly reproducible [16][17][18] and this interobserver variability influences the reliability of meta-analyses based on venographic data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%